» Articles » PMID: 16021480

Douglas-fir Ectomycorrhizae in 40- and 400-year-old Stands: Mycobiont Availability to Late Successional Western Hemlock

Overview
Journal Mycorrhiza
Date 2005 Jul 16
PMID 16021480
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi in forest stands containing both early successional Douglas-fir and late successional western hemlock at two points in the typical stand development by identifying EM fungi from roots of Douglas-fir and western hemlock in mixed stands. In an early seral stage forest, EM roots of western hemlock seedlings and intermingling 40-year-old Douglas-fir were sampled. In a late seral stage forest, EM roots of trees of both species were sampled in a 400-year-old stand. We use molecular approaches to identify the symbionts from field samples in this descriptive study. In the early seral stage study, >95% of the western hemlock root tips by biomass were colonized by fungi also colonizing Douglas-fir roots. This result supports the prediction that western hemlock can associate with fungi in Douglas-fir EM networks. In the same study, fungi specific to Douglas-fir colonized 14% of its EM root tips. In the late seral stage study, 14% of the western hemlock root tips were colonized by fungi also observed in association with Douglas-fir, a result strongly influenced by sampling issues and likely represents a conservative estimate of multiple host fungi in this old growth setting. Fungi specific to Douglas-fir colonized 25% of its root tip biomass in the old growth study, in tight coralloid clusters within five of the 24 soil samples. The trends revealed in this study corroborate earlier studies suggesting a predominance of multiple host fungi in mixed communities of EM plants. The role of host-specific fungi in these stands remains unclear.

Citing Articles

The influence of tree genus, phylogeny, and richness on the specificity, rarity, and diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi.

Tedersoo L, Drenkhan R, Abarenkov K, Anslan S, Bahram M, Bitenieks K Environ Microbiol Rep. 2024; 16(2):e13253.

PMID: 38575147 PMC: 10994715. DOI: 10.1111/1758-2229.13253.


Positive citation bias and overinterpreted results lead to misinformation on common mycorrhizal networks in forests.

Karst J, Jones M, Hoeksema J Nat Ecol Evol. 2023; 7(4):501-511.

PMID: 36782032 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-01986-1.


Ectomycorrhizal fungi mediate belowground carbon transfer between pines and oaks.

Cahanovitc R, Livne-Luzon S, Angel R, Klein T ISME J. 2022; 16(5):1420-1429.

PMID: 35042973 PMC: 9039061. DOI: 10.1038/s41396-022-01193-z.


Soil spore bank communities of ectomycorrhizal fungi in endangered Chinese Douglas-fir forests.

Wen Z, Shi L, Tang Y, Hong L, Xue J, Xing J Mycorrhiza. 2017; 28(1):49-58.

PMID: 28942552 DOI: 10.1007/s00572-017-0800-1.


High richness of ectomycorrhizal fungi and low host specificity in a coastal sand dune ecosystem revealed by network analysis.

Roy-Bolduc A, Laliberte E, Hijri M Ecol Evol. 2016; 6(1):349-62.

PMID: 26811798 PMC: 4716518. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1881.


References
1.
Rogers S, Yan Z, Shinohara M, LoBuglio K, Wang C . Messenger RNA intron in the nuclear 18s ribosomal RNA gene of deuteromycetes. Curr Genet. 1993; 23(4):338-42. DOI: 10.1007/BF00310896. View

2.
Dunham S, Kretzer A, Pfrender M . Characterization of Pacific golden chanterelle (Cantharellus formosus) genet size using co-dominant microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol. 2003; 12(6):1607-18. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01837.x. View

3.
Kretzer A, Luoma D, Molina R, Spatafora J . Taxonomy of the Rhizopogon vinicolor species complex based on analysis of ITS sequences and microsatellite loci. Mycologia. 2010; 95(3):480-7. View

4.
Horton T, Bruns T . The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into the black-box. Mol Ecol. 2001; 10(8):1855-71. DOI: 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01333.x. View

5.
Redecker D, Szaro T, Bowman R, Bruns T . Small genets of Lactarius xanthogalactus, Russula cremoricolor and Amanita francheti in late-stage ectomycorrhizal successions. Mol Ecol. 2001; 10(4):1025-34. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01230.x. View