» Articles » PMID: 16013624

How Pilot-hole Size Affects Bone-screw Pullout Strength in Human Cadaveric Cancellous Bone

Overview
Journal Can J Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2005 Jul 15
PMID 16013624
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Screw failure of cancellous bone screws is not uncommon. To compare the effect of varying pilot-hole size on pullout strength of cancellous bone screws in human cadaveric bone, we designed and performed a biomechanical study to allow quantitative analysis.

Methods: Three pairs of distal femurs and 4 pairs of proximal tibias from embalmed human cadavers were stabilized in a mould, and the bone cortex was overdrilled. Four sites in a linear transverse plane were randomly assigned, anatomically matched with the paired bone and drilled with either pilot-hole size 3.2 mm or 2.5 mm. The cancellous screw (Synthes noncannulated 4.5-mm shaft, 6.5-mm external diameter) was guided into the pilot hole and pulled on by a test frame (Instron 8874 biaxial servo-hydraulic test frame) with increasing force to the point of failure, and the forces at which failure resulted were compared.

Results: A comparison of 25 anatomically paired sites with a 2-tailed paired t test and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test indicated significantly stronger pullout strength (p = 0.047 and p = 0.047) of the 2.5-mm compared with the 3.2-mm pilot hole. Subanalysis of the 4 studied locations indicated that 3 supported the above findings and 1 supported a reverse trend.

Conclusions: Generally, cancellous screws demonstrated a significantly (p < 0.05) stronger hold using a smaller size pilot hole than the recommended standard diameter. All locations except the inner lateral site supported this finding.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the efficacy of modal analysis in predicting the pullout strength of fixation bone screws.

Einafshar M, Hashemi A, Kiapour A JOR Spine. 2023; 5(4):e1220.

PMID: 36601373 PMC: 9799086. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1220.


Salvaging Pull-Out Strength in a Previously Stripped Screw Site: A Comparison of Three Rescue Techniques.

Addevico F, Solitro G, Morandi M J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2021; 6(3).

PMID: 34564190 PMC: 8482251. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk6030071.


Functional Properties of Low-Modulus PMMA Bone Cements Containing Linoleic Acid.

Robo C, Wenner D, Ubhayasekera S, Hilborn J, Ohman-Magi C, Persson C J Funct Biomater. 2021; 12(1).

PMID: 33477310 PMC: 7839050. DOI: 10.3390/jfb12010005.


Kirschner wire prepared pilot holes improve screw pullout strength in synthetic osteoporotic-type bone.

Basmajian H, Liu J, Scudday T, Campbell S, Amin N J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020; 11(Suppl 1):S100-S104.

PMID: 31992927 PMC: 6978199. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.08.015.


Comparison and prediction of pullout strength of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws within synthetic bone.

Tsai W, Chen P, Lu T, Wu S, Shih K, Lin S BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009; 10:44.

PMID: 19402917 PMC: 2694760. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-44.

References
1.
Lovick D, Ryken T, Traynelis V, Dexter F . Assessment of primary and salvage lateral mass screw insertion torque in a cadaveric model. J Spinal Disord. 1997; 10(5):431-5. View

2.
Heller J, Estes B, Zaouali M, Diop A . Biomechanical study of screws in the lateral masses: variables affecting pull-out resistance. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78(9):1315-21. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199609000-00004. View

3.
ALHO A . Mineral and mechanics of bone fragility fractures. A review of fixation methods. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993; 64(2):227-32. DOI: 10.3109/17453679308994578. View

4.
Schatzker J, Horne J, Sumner-Smith G . The reaction of cortical bone to compression by screw threads. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975; (111):263-5. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197509000-00033. View

5.
Hughes A, Jordan B . The mechanical properties of surgical bone screws and some aspects of insertion practice. Injury. 1972; 4(1):25-38. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(72)80007-x. View