» Articles » PMID: 15998500

Normal and Disturbed Milk Ejection in Dairy Cows

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2005 Jul 7
PMID 15998500
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

More than 80% of the milk stored in the udder, i.e. the alveolar fraction, only available after milk ejection is induced by the release of oxytocin and myoepithelial contraction. Milk ejection is induced by tactile teat stimulation, either manually or by the milking machine. The time from the start of a tactile stimulation until the occurrence of milk ejection spans from 40 s up to more than 2 min and increases with decreasing degree of udder filling. Therefore, cows need a longer pre-stimulation in late stages of lactation or if the milking is performed shortly after the previous milking whereas in full udders, pre-stimulation is less important. Milk ejection can be disturbed under several conditions, for example, during milking in unfamiliar surroundings or for several weeks after parturition in many primiparous cows. We found that a disturbed milk ejection is due to a reduced release or complete absence of oxytocin from the pituitary. During milkings with disturbed milk ejection in unfamiliar surroundings, the concentrations of cortisol and beta-endorphin were elevated. While exogenous glucocorticoids could not induce the disturbance, morphine caused inhibition of oxytocin release during milking. However, spontaneously occurring disturbance of milk ejection could not be abolished by the opioid-antagonist naloxone. On the other hand, severity of disturbed milk ejection and coping capacity towards novel milking environment was inversely related to the cortisol release in response to ACTH, i.e. adrenal cortex activity. Therefore, the susceptibility of individual cows to the inhibition of oxytocin release and milk ejection could be predicted by an ACTH challenge test.

Citing Articles

Measurement of cow comfort during milking on different cluster removal settings through the use of leg-mounted accelerometers.

Browne M, Bolona P, Upton J JDS Commun. 2024; 5(5):462-467.

PMID: 39310823 PMC: 11410480. DOI: 10.3168/jdsc.2023-0477.


The Association of Delayed Milk Ejection with Milking Performance in Holstein Cows in a Large Dairy Herd with Suboptimal Premilking Teat Stimulation.

Singh A, Spellman M, Somula H, Dahl M, Wieland M Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 38929447 PMC: 11200793. DOI: 10.3390/ani14121828.


Anatomy and Physiology of Water Buffalo Mammary Glands: An Anatomofunctional Comparison with Dairy Cattle.

Mota-Rojas D, Napolitano F, Chay-Canul A, Ghezzi M, Braghieri A, Dominguez-Oliva A Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 38612305 PMC: 11011071. DOI: 10.3390/ani14071066.


Comparative Assessment of the Stress Response of Cattle to Common Dairy Management Practices.

Koenneker K, Schulze M, Pieper L, Jung M, Schmicke M, Beyer F Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(13).

PMID: 37443913 PMC: 10340065. DOI: 10.3390/ani13132115.


Is the temperament of crossbred dairy cows related to milk cortisol and oxytocin concentrations, milk yield, and quality?.

Marcal-Pedroza M, Campos M, Martins M, Silva M, Paranhos da Costa M, Negrao J PLoS One. 2023; 18(6):e0286466.

PMID: 37262031 PMC: 10234520. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286466.