» Articles » PMID: 15995835

Interobserver Delineation Variation Using CT Versus Combined CT + MRI in Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2005 Jul 5
PMID 15995835
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To quantify interobserver variation of prostate and seminal vesicle delineations using CT only versus CT + MRI in consensus reading with a radiologist.

Material And Methods: The prostate and seminal vesicles of 13 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostatic adenocarcinoma were retrospectively delineated by three radiation oncologists on CT only and on CT + MRI in consensus reading with a radiologist. The volumes and margin positions were calculated and intermodality and interobserver variations were assessed for the clinical target volume (CTV), seminal vesicles, prostate and three prostatic subdivisions (apical, middle and basal third).

Results: Using CT + MRI as compared to CT alone, the mean CTV, prostate and seminal vesicle volumes significantly decreased by 6.54%, 5.21% and 10.47%, respectively. More importantly, their standard deviations significantly decreased by 63.06%, 62.65% and 44.83%, respectively. The highest level of variation was found at the prostatic apex, followed by the prostatic base and seminal vesicles.

Conclusion: Addition of MRI to CT in consensus reading with a radiologist results in a moderate decrease of the CTV, but an important decrease of the interobserver delineation variation, especially at the prostatic apex.

Citing Articles

First-in-Men Online Adaptive Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Toward Ultrahypofractionation for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients.

Brand V, Milder M, Christianen M, de Vries K, Hoogeman M, Incrocci L Adv Radiat Oncol. 2025; 10(2):101701.

PMID: 39866592 PMC: 11758839. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101701.


Linac- and CyberKnife-based MRI-only treatment planning of prostate SBRT using an optimized synthetic CT calibration curve.

Scholey J, Nano T, Singhrao K, Mohamad O, Singer L, Larson P J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(9):e14411.

PMID: 38837851 PMC: 11492401. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14411.


Optimal planning target margin for prostate radiotherapy based on interfractional and intrafractional variability assessment during 1.5T MRI-guided radiotherapy.

Kim J, Sung J, Lee S, Cho K, Chung B, Yang D Front Oncol. 2024; 13:1337626.

PMID: 38173837 PMC: 10761547. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1337626.


Using a Further Planning MRI after Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy Significantly Reduces the Radiation Exposure of Organs at Risk in External Beam Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer.

Merten R, Fischer M, Christiansen H, Hellms S, von Klot C, Thomas N J Clin Med. 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 36675503 PMC: 9860985. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020574.


Evaluation of therapeutic radiographer contouring for magnetic resonance image guided online adaptive prostate radiotherapy.

Adair Smith G, Dunlop A, Alexander S, Barnes H, Casey F, Chick J Radiother Oncol. 2023; 180:109457.

PMID: 36608770 PMC: 10074473. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.109457.