The Unsolved Problem of Fistula After Left Pancreatectomy: the Benefit of Cautious Drain Management

Overview

Journal J Gastrointest Surg

Specialty Gastroenterology

Date 2005 Jun 30

PMID 15985241

Citations 51

Authors

Gianpaolo Balzano

Alessandro Zerbi

Marco Cristallo

Valerio Di Carlo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to identify factors related to the onset of pancreatic fistula and to define the characteristics of the fistula. The study group was composed of 123 patients who underwent left pancreatectomy since 1996. Pancreatic closure was accomplished by a hand-sewn technique (39 patients) or two kinds of mechanical staplers: Proximate (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) (46 patients) and Endo-GIA (United States Surgical, Norwalk, CT) (38 patients). Fistula was defined as output greater than 5 ml, with amylase x 5, after day 5. In case of fistula, the drain removal was scheduled at a daily output less than 5 ml. Mortality was 0%, morbidity was 48%, and pancreatic fistula rate was 34%. Fistula rate was 38% after hand-sewn closure, 26% after Proximate, and 39% after Endo-GIA (NS). None of the other factors (separate duct ligation, hand-sewn suture in addition to stapler, spleen preservation, use of pledgetted suture, sex, age, and indication for pancreatectomy) proved to be related to a reduction in the onset of fistula. All fistulas healed spontaneously. Mean fistula duration was 36 days; 92.8% of patients with fistula were discharged with drain. The policy of delayed drain removal allowed a low rate of fistula associated morbidity (16%) and of readmission (4.7%). In conclusion, fistula is an unsolved problem of left pancreatectomy. However, a careful drain management allows a good outcome in patients with fistula.

Citing Articles

Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of pancreatic stump closure using a hand-sewn or stapler technique in distal pancreatectomy.

Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Hablus M, Bari H, Pathanki A, Ali M Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2024; 28(3):302-314.

PMID: 38522846 PMC: 11341886. DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-015.

Cross-sectional imaging after pancreatic surgery: The dialogue between the radiologist and the surgeon.

Maino C, Cereda M, Franco P, Boraschi P, Cannella R, Gianotti L Eur J Radiol Open. 2024; 12:100544.

PMID: 38304573 PMC: 10831502. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100544.

Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Yields Superior Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Technique: A Single Surgeon Experience of 123 Consecutive Cases.

Ding H, Kawka M, Gall T, Wadsworth C, Habib N, Nicol D Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(22).

PMID: 38001752 PMC: 10669937. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225492.

Drain fluid biomarkers for prediction and diagnosis of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula: A narrative review.

Rykina-Tameeva N, Samra J, Sahni S, Mittal A World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022; 14(10):1089-1106.

PMID: 36386401 PMC: 9640330. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i10.1089.

[Endoscopic management of complications in the hepatobiliary and pancreatic system and the tracheobronchial tree].

Kouladouros K, Kahler G Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022; 94(5):469-484.

PMID: 36269350 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01735-3.

References

Lillemoe K, Kaushal S, Cameron J, Sohn T, Pitt H, Yeo C . Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients. Ann Surg. 1999; 229(5):693-8; discussion 698-700. PMC: 1420814. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199905000-00012. View

Buchler M, Wagner M, Schmied B, Uhl W, Friess H, Zgraggen K . Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 2003; 138(12):1310-4. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1310. View

Balcom 4th J, Rattner D, Warshaw A, Chang Y, Fernandez-Del Castillo C . Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg. 2001; 136(4):391-8. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.136.4.391. View

Suc B, Msika S, Fingerhut A, Fourtanier G, Hay J, Holmieres F . Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2002; 237(1):57-65. PMC: 1513966. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200301000-00009. View

Lillemoe K, Cameron J, Kim M, Campbell K, Sauter P, Coleman J . Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004; 8(7):766-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.06.011. View

Sugo H, Mikami Y, Matsumoto F, Tsumura H, Watanabe Y, Futagawa S . Comparison of ultrasonically activated scalpel versus conventional division for the pancreas in distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2001; 8(4):349-52. DOI: 10.1007/s005340170007. View

Hutchins R, Hart R, Pacifico M, Bradley N, Williamson R . Long-term results of distal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis in 90 patients. Ann Surg. 2002; 236(5):612-8. PMC: 1422619. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200211000-00011. View

BONNICHON P, Tong J, Ortega D, Louvel A, Grateau F, Icard P . [Pancreatic fistula after left pancreatectomy. Frequency and severity]. J Chir (Paris). 1988; 125(5):321-6. View

Sarr M . The potent somatostatin analogue vapreotide does not decrease pancreas-specific complications after elective pancreatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 196(4):556-64; discussion 564-5; author reply 565. DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00104-2. View

10.

Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E, Mascetta G, Salvia R, Falconi M . Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions. Dig Surg. 2004; 21(1):54-9. DOI: 10.1159/000075943. View

11.

Sugo H, Mikami Y, Matsumoto F, Tsumura H, Watanabe Y, Futagawa S . Distal pancreatectomy using the harmonic scalpel. Surgery. 2000; 128(3):490-1. DOI: 10.1067/msy.2000.108379. View

12.

Fabre J, Houry S, Manderscheid J, Huguier M, BAUMEL H . Surgery for left-sided pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 1996; 83(8):1065-70. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800830810. View

13.

Shoup M, Brennan M, McWhite K, Leung D, Klimstra D, Conlon K . The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 2002; 137(2):164-8. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.137.2.164. View

14.

Adam U, Makowiec F, Riediger H, Trzeczak S, Benz S, Hopt U . [Distal pancreatic resection--indications, techniques and complications]. Zentralbl Chir. 2001; 126(11):908-12. DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-19149. View

15.

Yeo C, Cameron J, Lillemoe K, Sauter P, Coleman J, Sohn T . Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2000; 232(3):419-29. PMC: 1421155. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200009000-00014. View

16.

Takeuchi K, Tsuzuki Y, Ando T, Sekihara M, Hara T, Kori T . Distal pancreatectomy: is staple closure beneficial?. ANZ J Surg. 2003; 73(11):922-5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02821.x. View

17.

Sheehan M, Beck K, Creech S, Pickleman J, Aranha G . Distal pancreatectomy: does the method of closure influence fistula formation?. Am Surg. 2002; 68(3):264-7; discussion 267-8. View

18.

Lowy A, Lee J, Pisters P, Davidson B, Fenoglio C, Stanford P . Prospective, randomized trial of octreotide to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant disease. Ann Surg. 1997; 226(5):632-41. PMC: 1191125. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199711000-00008. View

19.

Ohwada S, Ogawa T, Tanahashi Y, Nakamura S, Takeyoshi I, Ohya T . Fibrin glue sandwich prevents pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. World J Surg. 1998; 22(5):494-8. DOI: 10.1007/s002689900423. View

20.

Suzuki Y, Kuroda Y, Morita A, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y, Kawamura T . Fibrin glue sealing for the prevention of pancreatic fistulas following distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 1995; 130(9):952-5. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430090038015. View