» Articles » PMID: 15973223

Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Artery Stent Patency with Multislice CT: Preliminary Experience

Overview
Journal Radiol Med
Specialty Radiology
Date 2005 Jun 24
PMID 15973223
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCT-CA) in the detection of in-stent restenosis.

Materials And Methods: Forty-two patients (33 male, 9 female, mean age 58+/-8 years) previously subjected to percutaneous implantation of coronary stent with suspected in-stent restenosis, underwent a 16-row MSCT (Sensation 16, Siemens) examination. The average time between stent implantation and MSCT-CA was 7.4+/-5.3 months. The following scan parameters were used: collimation 16x0.75 mm, rotation time 0.42 s, feed 3.0 mm/rot., kV 120, mAs 500. After administration of iodinated contrast material (Iomeprol 400 mgI/ml, 100 ml at 4 ml/s) and bolus chaser (40 ml of saline at 4 ml/s) the scan was completed in <20 s. All segments with a stent were assessed by two observers in consensus and were graded according to the following scheme: patent stent, in-stent intimal hyperplasia (IIH) (lumen reduction <50%), in-stent restenosis (ISR) (=/>50%), in-stent occlusion (ISO) (100%). Consensus reading was compared with coronary angiography.

Results: Forty-seven stents were assessed (16 in the right coronary artery; 4 in the left main; 22 in the left anterior descending; 5 in the circumflex). In 7 (17%) stents there was ISR (3) or ISO (4), and in 4 (10%) stents there was IIH. The sensitivity and negative predictive values for the detection of ISO were 80% and 98%, respectively, while for the detection of ISR+ISO they were 50% and 89%, respectively.

Conclusions: Although the results are encouraging, the follow-up of stent patency with MSCT-CA does not show a diagnostic accuracy suitable for clinical implementation.

Citing Articles

Comparison of 16-slice computed tomography with conventional angiography to evaluate coronary artery stent patency.

Durur-Subasi I, Kantarci M, Durur-Karakaya A, Okur A Eurasian J Med. 2015; 41(1):4-9.

PMID: 25610056 PMC: 4261646.


Comparison between different kernel reformatting filters in 3D quantitative analysis of MDCT coronary angiography.

Malago R, Pezzato A, Barbiani C, Mantovani W, Caliari G, Alfonsi U Radiol Med. 2011; 116(8):1203-16.

PMID: 21892715 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0719-0.


Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis.

Hamon M, Champ-Rigot L, Morello R, Riddell J, Hamon M Eur Radiol. 2007; 18(2):217-25.

PMID: 17763854 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0743-6.


In vitro evaluation of coronary stents and in-stent stenosis using a dynamic cardiac phantom and a 64-detector row CT scanner.

Schlosser T, Scheuermann T, Ulzheimer S, Mohrs O, Kuhling M, Albrecht P Clin Res Cardiol. 2007; 96(12):883-90.

PMID: 17694381 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-007-0564-2.


Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT in the assessment of coronary stents.

Cademartiri F, Palumbo A, Maffei E, La Grutta L, Runza G, Pugliese F Radiol Med. 2007; 112(4):526-37.

PMID: 17568993 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-007-0159-z.