» Articles » PMID: 15960821

Overview of BioCreAtIvE: Critical Assessment of Information Extraction for Biology

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2005 Jun 18
PMID 15960821
Citations 169
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The goal of the first BioCreAtIvE challenge (Critical Assessment of Information Extraction in Biology) was to provide a set of common evaluation tasks to assess the state of the art for text mining applied to biological problems. The results were presented in a workshop held in Granada, Spain March 28-31, 2004. The articles collected in this BMC Bioinformatics supplement entitled "A critical assessment of text mining methods in molecular biology" describe the BioCreAtIvE tasks, systems, results and their independent evaluation.

Results: BioCreAtIvE focused on two tasks. The first dealt with extraction of gene or protein names from text, and their mapping into standardized gene identifiers for three model organism databases (fly, mouse, yeast). The second task addressed issues of functional annotation, requiring systems to identify specific text passages that supported Gene Ontology annotations for specific proteins, given full text articles.

Conclusion: The first BioCreAtIvE assessment achieved a high level of international participation (27 groups from 10 countries). The assessment provided state-of-the-art performance results for a basic task (gene name finding and normalization), where the best systems achieved a balanced 80% precision / recall or better, which potentially makes them suitable for real applications in biology. The results for the advanced task (functional annotation from free text) were significantly lower, demonstrating the current limitations of text-mining approaches where knowledge extrapolation and interpretation are required. In addition, an important contribution of BioCreAtIvE has been the creation and release of training and test data sets for both tasks. There are 22 articles in this special issue, including six that provide analyses of results or data quality for the data sets, including a novel inter-annotator consistency assessment for the test set used in task 2.

Citing Articles

Dataset from a human-in-the-loop approach to identify functionally important protein residues from literature.

Vollmar M, Tirunagari S, Harrus D, Armstrong D, Gaborova R, Gupta D Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):1032.

PMID: 39333508 PMC: 11436914. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03841-9.


Integrating deep learning architectures for enhanced biomedical relation extraction: a pipeline approach.

Sarol M, Hong G, Guerra E, Kilicoglu H Database (Oxford). 2024; 2024.

PMID: 39197056 PMC: 11352595. DOI: 10.1093/database/baae079.


Towards discovery: an end-to-end system for uncovering novel biomedical relations.

Almeida T, Jonker R, Antunes R, Almeida J, Matos S Database (Oxford). 2024; 2024.

PMID: 38994795 PMC: 11240158. DOI: 10.1093/database/baae057.


Vocabulary Matters: An Annotation Pipeline and Four Deep Learning Algorithms for Enzyme Named Entity Recognition.

Wang M, Vijayaraghavan A, Beck T, Posma J J Proteome Res. 2024; 23(6):1915-1925.

PMID: 38733346 PMC: 11165580. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00367.


Overview of the COVID-19 text mining tool interactive demonstration track in BioCreative VII.

Chatr-Aryamontri A, Hirschman L, Ross K, Oughtred R, Krallinger M, Dolinski K Database (Oxford). 2022; 2022.

PMID: 36197453 PMC: 9534061. DOI: 10.1093/database/baac084.


References
1.
Hanisch D, Fundel K, Mevissen H, Zimmer R, Fluck J . ProMiner: rule-based protein and gene entity recognition. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005; 6 Suppl 1:S14. PMC: 1869006. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S14. View

2.
Fundel K, Guttler D, Zimmer R, Apostolakis J . A simple approach for protein name identification: prospects and limits. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005; 6 Suppl 1:S15. PMC: 1869007. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S15. View

3.
Blaschke C, Leon E, Krallinger M, Valencia A . Evaluation of BioCreAtIvE assessment of task 2. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005; 6 Suppl 1:S16. PMC: 1869008. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S16. View

4.
Camon E, Barrell D, Dimmer E, Lee V, Magrane M, Maslen J . An evaluation of GO annotation retrieval for BioCreAtIvE and GOA. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005; 6 Suppl 1:S17. PMC: 1869009. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S17. View

5.
Ray S, Craven M . Learning statistical models for annotating proteins with function information using biomedical text. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005; 6 Suppl 1:S18. PMC: 1869010. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S18. View