» Articles » PMID: 15956204

Seeing What is Not There Shows the Costs of Perceptual Learning

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2005 Jun 16
PMID 15956204
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Perceptual learning is an improvement in one's sensory abilities after training and is thought to help us to better adapt to the sensory environment. Here, we show that perceptual learning also can lead to misperceptions, such that subjects actually perceive stimuli when none are physically presented. After learning, subjects not only showed enhanced performance when tested with the motion direction of the trained stimulus but also often reported seeing dots moving in the trained direction when no stimulus was displayed. We further show that these misperceptions are not attributable to a response bias. These results show that there are costs as well as benefits to perceptual learning and that performance enhancements for a specific feature also can be accompanied by misperceptions of the visual environment.

Citing Articles

Asymmetric stimulus representations bias visual perceptual learning.

Laamerad P, Awada A, Pack C, Bakhtiari S J Vis. 2024; 24(1):10.

PMID: 38285454 PMC: 10829801. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.1.10.


Comparing random dot motion in MATLAB vs. Inquisit Millisecond.

Yaghoubi K, Kabbara S, Arian S, Kobaissi H, Peters M, Seitz A Front Psychol. 2022; 13:1035518.

PMID: 36562063 PMC: 9763265. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035518.


Change-detection training and its effects on visual processing skills.

Truong J, Buschkuehl M, Smith-Peirce R, Carrillo A, Seitz A, Jaeggi S Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):12646.

PMID: 35879360 PMC: 9314349. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15649-x.


Expectations developed over multiple timescales facilitate visual search performance.

Gekas N, Seitz A, Series P J Vis. 2015; 15(9):10.

PMID: 26200891 PMC: 4511121. DOI: 10.1167/15.9.10.


Visual perceptual learning by operant conditioning training follows rules of contingency.

Kim D, Seitz A, Watanabe T Vis cogn. 2015; 23(1-2):147-160.

PMID: 26028984 PMC: 4443931. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2015.1015663.


References
1.
Hubel D, Wiesel T . EFFECTS OF MONOCULAR DEPRIVATION IN KITTENS. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol. 1964; 248:492-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00348878. View

2.
Arnsten A . Catecholamine regulation of the prefrontal cortex. J Psychopharmacol. 1997; 11(2):151-62. DOI: 10.1177/026988119701100208. View

3.
Eskandar E, Assad J . Dissociation of visual, motor and predictive signals in parietal cortex during visual guidance. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 2(1):88-93. DOI: 10.1038/4594. View

4.
Vaina L, Belliveau J, des Roziers E, Zeffiro T . Neural systems underlying learning and representation of global motion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(21):12657-62. PMC: 22887. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12657. View

5.
Schoups A, Vogels R, Orban G . Human perceptual learning in identifying the oblique orientation: retinotopy, orientation specificity and monocularity. J Physiol. 1995; 483 ( Pt 3):797-810. PMC: 1157819. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020623. View