» Articles » PMID: 15954930

Patient Education and Access of ESRD Patients to Renal Replacement Therapies Beyond In-center Hemodialysis

Overview
Journal Kidney Int
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2005 Jun 16
PMID 15954930
Citations 85
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Nephrologists report that patients' choice should play an important role in the selection of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In the United States, kidney transplant rates remain low and <10% of patients utilize home dialysis therapies. This study examined the effect of pre-ESRD processes on the selection of RRT among incident ESRD patients.

Methods: Using surveys, data were collected for all patients admitted to 229 dialysis units in ESRD Network 18 between April 1, 2002 and May 31, 2002. A total of 1365 patients began chronic dialysis and 1193 facility (87%) and 428 patient (31%) surveys were returned.

Results: Substantial proportions of patients were unaware of their kidney disease (36%) or were not seeing a nephrologist (36%) until <4 months before first dialysis. The presentation of treatment options was delayed (48% either after or < 1 month before the first dialysis). The majority of ESRD patients were not presented with chronic peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis, or renal transplantation as options (66%, 88%, and 74%, respectively). Using multivariate analyses, variables significantly associated with selection of chronic peritoneal dialysis as dialysis modality were the probability of chronic peritoneal dialysis being presented as a treatment option and the time spent on patient education.

Conclusion: An incomplete presentation of treatment options is an important reason for under-utilization of home dialysis therapies and probably delays access to transplantation. Improvements in and reimbursement for pre-ESRD education could provide an equal and timely access for all medically suitable patients to various RRTs.

Citing Articles

Home Sweet Home: A Program Report on Promoting the Uptake of Home Dialysis.

Churchill L, Reintjes F, Pauly R, Shah N, Thompson S Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2025; 12():20543581241312625.

PMID: 39802878 PMC: 11724405. DOI: 10.1177/20543581241312625.


Uptake and Outcomes of Peritoneal Dialysis among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People: Analysis of Registry Data.

Hayat A, Cho Y, Pascoe E, Krishnasamy R, Borlace M, Chen J Kidney Int Rep. 2024; 9(5):1484-1495.

PMID: 38707791 PMC: 11068974. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.01.059.


Usage and Health Outcomes of Home Hemodialysis vs Center Hemodialysis in Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups in the United States a Quantitative Research in 2016-2019 USRDS Using Aday-Anderson Framework and Multiple Regression Models.

Zhu Y Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2024; 15:1-16.

PMID: 38222923 PMC: 10787550. DOI: 10.2147/PROM.S416279.


Physician Knowledge and Attitudes Toward the Adoption of Peritoneal Dialysis in the Treatment of Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease.

Lalani H, Ganguly A, Brown L, Smartt J, Johnson D, Bhavan K Cureus. 2023; 14(12):e32708.

PMID: 36686081 PMC: 9848698. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32708.


Peritoneal dialysis after shared decision-making: the disparity between reality and patient expectations.

Ho Y, Hsu P, Yang K BMC Nurs. 2022; 21(1):268.

PMID: 36180845 PMC: 9524315. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-01043-5.