» Articles » PMID: 15953425

Intravitreal Versus Retrobulbar Injections of Triamcinolone for Macular Edema Associated with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Overview
Journal Am J Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2005 Jun 15
PMID 15953425
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the short-term effect of intravitreal versus retrobulbar injection of triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of macular edema caused by branch retinal vein occlusion.

Design: Randomized clinical trial.

Methods: Sixty eyes of 60 patients who had macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion were randomly assigned to receive a single intravitreal injection (4 mg) or repeated retrobulbar injections (40 mg, three times) of triamcinolone. These injections (first injection in the retrobulbar group) were given approximately 1 week after focal laser photocoagulation. Using optical coherence tomography, the central retinal (foveal) thickness and total macular volume were measured before and at 1 and 3 months after injection. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and the incidence of reinjection were also examined. Fifty-two patients (86.7%) completed the 3-month follow-up.

Results: The mean foveal thickness and total macular volume decreased significantly after either intravitreal or repeated retrobulbar triamcinolone injections. Foveal thickness and macular volume were significantly less after intravitreal injection than after repeated retrobulbar injections, although there had been no significant differences at baseline. The percent reductions in foveal thickness and macular volume were also greater after intravitreal injection than after retrobulbar injections. Improvement in visual acuity was significantly better after intravitreal injection than after the retrobulbar injections. The incidence of intraocular pressure rise (to > or =20 mm Hg) was greater in the intravitreal group than in the retrobulbar group, but this was readily controlled by the use of antiglaucoma medications. After completion of the 3-month follow-up, 24 patients (46.2%) underwent reinjection. The need for reinjections was significantly greater in the retrobulbar group than in the intravitreal group (P = .0001).

Conclusions: A single intravitreal injection of triamcinolone is significantly more effective than are repeated retrobulbar injections in reducing macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion, and leads to greater improvement in visual acuity.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of different routes of triamcinolone acetonide administration on macular edema: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Liu K, Yi J, Xu J, Zhong L, Su N PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317782.

PMID: 39854565 PMC: 11760001. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317782.


Nanotechnology-based ocular drug delivery systems: recent advances and future prospects.

Li S, Chen L, Fu Y J Nanobiotechnology. 2023; 21(1):232.

PMID: 37480102 PMC: 10362606. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-023-01992-2.


SCORE2 Report 24: Nonlinear Relationship of Retinal Thickness and Visual Acuity in Central Retinal and Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion.

Scott I, Oden N, VanVeldhuisen P, Ip M, Blodi B Ophthalmology. 2023; 130(10):1066-1072.

PMID: 37220815 PMC: 10524366. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.05.023.


Glaucoma and Systemic Disease.

Hsu E, Desai M Life (Basel). 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 37109547 PMC: 10143901. DOI: 10.3390/life13041018.


In Situ Formation of Injectable Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) Hydrogels for Effective Intraocular Delivery of Triamcinolone Acetonide.

Shen C, Zhao X, Ren Z, Yang B, Wang X, Hu A Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(5).

PMID: 36902389 PMC: 10003315. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054957.