» Articles » PMID: 15933000

Persistence and Differential Survival of Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Subtropical Waters and Sediments

Overview
Date 2005 Jun 4
PMID 15933000
Citations 118
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fecal coliforms and enterococci are indicator organisms used worldwide to monitor water quality. These bacteria are used in microbial source tracking (MST) studies, which attempt to assess the contribution of various host species to fecal pollution in water. Ideally, all strains of a given indicator organism (IO) would experience equal persistence (maintenance of culturable populations) in water; however, some strains may have comparatively extended persistence outside the host, while others may persist very poorly in environmental waters. Assessment of the relative contribution of host species to fecal pollution would be confounded by differential persistence of strains. Here, freshwater and saltwater mesocosms, including sediments, were inoculated with dog feces, sewage, or contaminated soil and were incubated under conditions that included natural stressors such as microbial predators, radiation, and temperature fluctuations. Persistence of IOs was measured by decay rates (change in culturable counts over time). Decay rates were influenced by IO, inoculum, water type, sediment versus water column location, and Escherichia coli strain. Fecal coliform decay rates were significantly lower than those of enterococci in freshwater but were not significantly different in saltwater. IO persistence according to mesocosm treatment followed the trend: contaminated soil > wastewater > dog feces. E. coli ribotyping demonstrated that certain strains were more persistent than others in freshwater mesocosms, and the distribution of ribotypes sampled from mesocosm waters was dissimilar from the distribution in fecal material. These results have implications for the accuracy of MST methods, modeling of microbial populations in water, and efficacy of regulatory standards for protection of water quality.

Citing Articles

Dredging and sediment discharge in a river with floodplain. Physicochemical and microbiological effects in Paraná river.

Gonzalez M, Gonzalez S, Paira A, Collins P Heliyon. 2025; 11(1):e41224.

PMID: 39811288 PMC: 11731218. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41224.


Abundance of fecal indicator bacteria and diversity of Escherichia coli associated with poultry farms and pasture land cover in streams of northwestern South Carolina.

Britt V, Liao M, Lewis G Environ Monit Assess. 2024; 197(1):15.

PMID: 39630299 PMC: 11618215. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-024-13499-w.


Advancing Source Tracking: Systematic Review and Source-Specific Genome Database Curation of Fecally Shed Prokaryotes.

Lindner B, Choudhury R, Pinamang P, Bingham L, DAmico I, Hatt J Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2024; 11(9):931-939.

PMID: 39280079 PMC: 11391576. DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00233.


Examining the potential impacts of a coastal renourishment project on the presence and abundance of Escherichia coli.

Lewis J, Frost V, Heard M PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0304061.

PMID: 38787843 PMC: 11125542. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304061.


Assessing the nucleic acid decay of human wastewater markers and enteric viruses in estuarine waters in Sydney, Australia.

Ahmed W, Korajkic A, Gabrewold M, Payyappat S, Cassidy M, Harrison N Sci Total Environ. 2024; 926:171389.

PMID: 38432386 PMC: 11070875. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171389.


References
1.
Solo-Gabriele H, Wolfert M, Desmarais T, Palmer C . Sources of Escherichia coli in a coastal subtropical environment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000; 66(1):230-7. PMC: 91811. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.1.230-237.2000. View

2.
Desmarais T, Solo-Gabriele H, Palmer C . Influence of soil on fecal indicator organisms in a tidally influenced subtropical environment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002; 68(3):1165-72. PMC: 123749. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1165-1172.2002. View

3.
Fujioka R, Sian-Denton C, Borja M, Castro J, Morphew K . Soil: the environmental source of Escherichia coli and Enterococci in Guam's streams. J Appl Microbiol. 2010; 85 Suppl 1:83S-89S. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1998.tb05286.x. View

4.
Harwood V, Wiggins B, Hagedorn C, Ellender R, Gooch J, Kern J . Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study. J Water Health. 2004; 1(4):153-66. View

5.
Davies C, Long J, Donald M, Ashbolt N . Survival of fecal microorganisms in marine and freshwater sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995; 61(5):1888-96. PMC: 167451. DOI: 10.1128/aem.61.5.1888-1896.1995. View