» Articles » PMID: 15913707

Exposure of Trucking Company Workers to Particulate Matter During the Winter

Overview
Journal Chemosphere
Date 2005 May 26
PMID 15913707
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study analyzed the workplace area concentrations and the personal exposure concentrations to fine particulate (PM2.5), elemental carbon (EC), and organic carbon (OC) measured during the winter period in trucking companies. The averaged personal exposure concentrations at breathing zones of workers are much greater than those of the microenvironment concentrations. The highest difference between the area (microenvironment) and personal exposure concentrations was in the PM2.5 concentrations followed by the OC concentrations. The area concentrations of PM2.5, EC, and OC at a large terminal were higher than those at a small one. The highest area concentrations of PM2.5, EC, and OC were observed in the shop areas followed by pick-up and delivery (P&D) areas. The area concentrations and personal exposure to PM2.5, EC, and OC in the shop and P&D areas which are highly affected by diesel engine exhaust emissions were much higher than those in the docks which are significantly affected by liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) engine exhaust emissions. The highest EC fraction to the total carbon (EC + OC) concentrations was observed in the shops, while the lowest one was identified in the offices. The personal exposure of the smoking workers to PM2.5 and OC was much higher than that of the non-smoking workers. However, the smoking might not significantly contribute to the personal exposure to EC. There were significant correlations between the PM2.5 and OC concentrations in both the area and personal exposure concentrations. However, significant correlations between the PM2.5 and EC concentrations and between the OC and EC concentrations were not identified.

Citing Articles

Occupational Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter (PM and PM) during Hand-Made Cookware Operation: Personal, Indoor and Outdoor Levels.

Shezi B, Mathee A, Cele N, Ndabandaba S, Street R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(20).

PMID: 33081113 PMC: 7602743. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17207522.


Diphlorethohydroxycarmalol Attenuates Fine Particulate Matter-Induced Subcellular Skin Dysfunction.

Zhen A, Piao M, Hyun Y, Kang K, Fernando P, Cho S Mar Drugs. 2019; 17(2).

PMID: 30717280 PMC: 6410332. DOI: 10.3390/md17020095.


Particulate matter 2.5 damages skin cells by inducing oxidative stress, subcellular organelle dysfunction, and apoptosis.

Piao M, Ahn M, Kang K, Ryu Y, Hyun Y, Shilnikova K Arch Toxicol. 2018; 92(6):2077-2091.

PMID: 29582092 PMC: 6002468. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-018-2197-9.


Potential air toxics hot spots in truck terminals and cabs.

Smith T, Davis M, Hart J, Blicharz A, Laden F, Garshick E Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2013; (172):5-82.

PMID: 23409510 PMC: 5116924.


Health effects research and regulation of diesel exhaust: an historical overview focused on lung cancer risk.

Hesterberg T, Long C, Bunn W, Lapin C, McClellan R, Valberg P Inhal Toxicol. 2012; 24 Suppl 1:1-45.

PMID: 22663144 PMC: 3423304. DOI: 10.3109/08958378.2012.691913.


References
1.
Neumann H . Health risk of combustion products: toxicological considerations. Chemosphere. 2001; 42(5-7):473-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(00)00219-8. View

2.
Ormstad H . Suspended particulate matter in indoor air: adjuvants and allergen carriers. Toxicology. 2000; 152(1-3):53-68. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-483x(00)00292-4. View

3.
Woskie S, Smith T, Hammond S, Schenker M, Garshick E, Speizer F . Estimation of the diesel exhaust exposures of railroad workers: II. National and historical exposures. Am J Ind Med. 1988; 13(3):395-404. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700130308. View

4.
Seaton A, MacNee W, Donaldson K, Godden D . Particulate air pollution and acute health effects. Lancet. 1995; 345(8943):176-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90173-6. View

5.
Greenwell L, Moreno T, Jones T, Richards R . Particle-induced oxidative damage is ameliorated by pulmonary antioxidants. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002; 32(9):898-905. DOI: 10.1016/s0891-5849(02)00782-7. View