» Articles » PMID: 15913005

The Influence of Processing Objectives on the Perception of Faces: an ERP Study of Race and Gender Perception

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2005 May 26
PMID 15913005
Citations 98
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In two experiments, event-related potentials were used to examine the effects of attentional focus on the processing of race and gender cues from faces. When faces were still the focal stimuli, the processing of the faces at a level deeper than the social category by requiring a personality judgment resulted in early attention to race and gender, with race effects as early as 120 msec. This time course corresponds closely to those in past studies in which participants explicitly attended to target race and gender (Ito & Urland, 2003). However, a similar processing goal, coupled with a more complex stimulus array, delayed social category effects until 190 msec, in accord with the effects of complexity on visual attention. In addition, the N170 typically linked with structural face encoding was modulated by target race, but not by gender, when faces were perceived in a homogenous context consisting only of faces. This suggests that when basic-level distinctions between faces and nonfaces are irrelevant, the mechanism previously associated only with structural encoding can also be sensitive to features used to differentiate among faces.

Citing Articles

Decoding the Temporal Structures and Interactions of Multiple Face Dimensions Using Optically Pumped Magnetometer Magnetoencephalography (OPM-MEG).

Xu W, Lyu B, Ru X, Li D, Gu W, Ma X J Neurosci. 2024; 44(47).

PMID: 39358044 PMC: 11580774. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2237-23.2024.


Event-related pupillary response-based authentication system using eye-tracker add-on augmented reality glasses for individual identification.

Park S, Ha J, Kim L Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1325784.

PMID: 39193438 PMC: 11347300. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1325784.


Is gender primacy universal?.

Martin A, Guevara Beltran D, Koster J, Tracy J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(35):e2401919121.

PMID: 39159369 PMC: 11363275. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2401919121.


Determinants of automatic age and race bias: ingroup-outgroup distinction salience moderates automatic evaluations of social groups.

Heitmann S, Reichardt R Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1328775.

PMID: 38562233 PMC: 10982430. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1328775.


The speed of race.

de Lissa P, Schaller P, Caldara R Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023; 19(1).

PMID: 38102475 PMC: 10868132. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsad076.


References
1.
Macrae C, Bodenhausen G . Social cognition: thinking categorically about others. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001; 51:93-120. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.93. View

2.
Semlitsch H, Anderer P, Schuster P, Presslich O . A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology. 1986; 23(6):695-703. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x. View

3.
Ito T, Thompson E, Cacioppo J . Tracking the timecourse of social perception: the effects of racial cues on event-related brain potentials. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004; 30(10):1267-80. DOI: 10.1177/0146167204264335. View

4.
Rees G, Lavie N . What can functional imaging reveal about the role of attention in visual awareness?. Neuropsychologia. 2001; 39(12):1343-53. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00122-1. View

5.
Wheeler M, Fiske S . Controlling racial prejudice: social-cognitive goals affect amygdala and stereotype activation. Psychol Sci. 2005; 16(1):56-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00780.x. View