» Articles » PMID: 15891830

Multiple Predator Effects Result in Risk Reduction for Prey Across Multiple Prey Densities

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2005 May 14
PMID 15891830
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Investigating how prey density influences a prey's combined predation risk from multiple predator species is critical for understanding the widespread importance of multiple predator effects. We conducted experiments that crossed six treatments consisting of zero, one, or two predator species (hellgrammites, greenside darters, and creek chubs) with three treatments in which we varied the density of mayfly prey. None of the multiple predator effects in our system were independent, and instead, the presence of multiple predator species resulted in risk reduction for the prey across both multiple predator combinations and all three levels of prey density. Risk reduction is likely to have population-level consequences for the prey, resulting in larger prey populations than would be predicted if the effects of multiple predator species were independent. For one of the two multiple predator combinations, the magnitude of risk reduction marginally increased with prey density. As a result, models predicting the combined risk from multiple predator species in this system will sometimes need to account for prey density as a factor influencing per-capita prey death rates.

Citing Articles

Influence of habitat complexity on the prey mortality in IGP system involving insect predators (Heteroptera) and prey (Diptera): Implications in biological control.

Brahma S, Sharma D, Banerjee S, Saha G, Aditya G PLoS One. 2022; 17(3):e0264840.

PMID: 35286333 PMC: 8920208. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264840.


Combination of generalist predators, Nesidiocoris tenuis and Macrolophus pygmaeus, with a companion plant, Sesamum indicum: What benefit for biological control of Tuta absoluta?.

Konan K, Monticelli L, Ouali-Ngoran S, Ramirez-Romero R, Martin T, Desneux N PLoS One. 2021; 16(9):e0257925.

PMID: 34591899 PMC: 8483325. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257925.


Coldwater fish in a warm water world: Implications for predation of salmon smolts during estuary transit.

Nobriga M, Michel C, Johnson R, Wikert J Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(15):10381-10395.

PMID: 34367582 PMC: 8328468. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7840.


Prey and predator density-dependent interactions under different water volumes.

Cuthbert R, Dalu T, Wasserman R, Sentis A, Weyl O, Froneman P Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(11):6504-6512.

PMID: 34141235 PMC: 8207356. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7503.


Predator-specific responses and emergent multi-predator effects on oviposition site choice in grey treefrogs, .

Resetarits Jr W, Bohenek J, Pintar M Proc Biol Sci. 2021; 288(1950):20210558.

PMID: 33975473 PMC: 8113890. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0558.


References
1.
Soluk D, Collins N . A mechanism for interference between stream predators: responses of the stonefly Agnetina capitata to the presence of sculpins. Oecologia. 2017; 76(4):630-632. DOI: 10.1007/BF00397881. View

2.
Obrycki J, Giles K, Ormord A . Interactions between an introduced and indigenous coccinellid species at different prey densities. Oecologia. 2017; 117(1-2):279-285. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050659. View

3.
Sih A, Englund G, Wooster D . Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 13(9):350-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01437-2. View

4.
Hirvonen H, Ranta E . Prey to predator size ratio influences foraging efficiency of larval Aeshna juncea dragonflies. Oecologia. 2017; 106(3):407-415. DOI: 10.1007/BF00334569. View

5.
Eklov P . Chemical cues from multiple predator-prey interactions induce changes in behavior and growth of anuran larvae. Oecologia. 2017; 123(2):192-199. DOI: 10.1007/s004420051005. View