» Articles » PMID: 15881657

Altered Lipid Profile and Changes in Uroplakin Properties of Rat Urothelial Plasma Membrane with Diets of Different Lipid Composition

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2005 May 11
PMID 15881657
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rigid plaques containing protein particles in plasma membrane build on the apical surface of the mammalian urothelium. We have previously shown that dietary fats modified the fatty acid profile as well as the fluorescence anisotropy of rat urothelial plasma membranes. In this study, we have further examined the proportion of phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, cerebrosides, sulfatides and cholesterol in detergent resistant (DRM) and soluble (DSM) plasma membrane fractions as well as the properties of the particles. Four groups of weaned rats were fed for 12 weeks on a commercial diet (control), or on a formula containing 5% (w/w) of corn oil, fish oil or olein. The control DRM behaved as a distinctive domain since it was enriched in cholesterol and glycosphingolipids. DSM showed higher levels of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine with respect to DRM. On the other hand, the lipid distributions were affected by the diets. Homogeneous lipid distributions between DSM and DRM were found in olein membranes, suggesting a decreased potential formation of lipid domains. In addition, properties of the uroplakins were altered by dietary treatments. Thus, uroplakins (UP) Ia, Ib, II and III observed by SDS-PAGE, were in lower proportions (mainly olein) than in controls. Moreover, a higher proportion of UPIII was cross-linked to UPIII and UPlb in olein treatment than in control. Meanwhile, only cross-linking to UPIII or UPIb was altered in corn and fish diets, respectively. These results suggest a role of the lipids in the establishment of the uroplakin interactions. Thus, specific dietary fats may have important functional implications.

Citing Articles

FTIR Spectroscopic Imaging Supports Urine Cytology for Classification of Low- and High-Grade Bladder Carcinoma.

Kujdowicz M, Mech B, Chrabaszcz K, Chlosta P, Okon K, Malek K Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(22).

PMID: 34830887 PMC: 8616357. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225734.


In Vitro Spectroscopy-Based Profiling of Urothelial Carcinoma: A Fourier Transform Infrared and Raman Imaging Study.

Kujdowicz M, Placha W, Mech B, Chrabaszcz K, Okon K, Malek K Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(1).

PMID: 33401726 PMC: 7796146. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010123.


The urothelium of a hibernator: the American black bear.

Spector D, Deng J, Coleman R, Wade J Physiol Rep. 2015; 3(6).

PMID: 26109187 PMC: 4510630. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12429.


Membrane lipids and proteins as modulators of urothelial endocytic vesicles pathways.

Grasso E, Calderon R Histochem Cell Biol. 2013; 140(5):507-20.

PMID: 23624723 DOI: 10.1007/s00418-013-1095-8.


Urothelial endocytic vesicle recycling and lysosomal degradative pathway regulated by lipid membrane composition.

Grasso E, Calderon R Histochem Cell Biol. 2012; 139(2):249-65.

PMID: 23064746 DOI: 10.1007/s00418-012-1034-0.


References
1.
Eynard A, Monis B . Concanavalin A sites in urothelium and milk fat globules of essential fatty acid (EFA) deficient rats. J Submicrosc Cytol. 1983; 15(2):375-82. View

2.
Laemmli U . Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970; 227(5259):680-5. DOI: 10.1038/227680a0. View

3.
Caruthers J, BONNEVILLE M . The asymmetric unit membrane (AUM) structure in the lumenal plasma membrane of urothelium: the effect of trypsin on the integrity of the plaques. J Ultrastruct Res. 1980; 71(3):288-302. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5320(80)90080-5. View

4.
Min G, Zhou G, Schapira M, Sun T, Kong X . Structural basis of urothelial permeability barrier function as revealed by Cryo-EM studies of the 16 nm uroplakin particle. J Cell Sci. 2003; 116(Pt 20):4087-94. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.00811. View

5.
Eynard A, Cejas V, Silva R, Quiroga P, Munoz S . Histopathology of essential fatty acid-deficient mice. Nutrition. 1992; 8(1):37-40. View