» Articles » PMID: 15872361

Correction Methods for Random Coincidences in Fully 3D Whole-body PET: Impact on Data and Image Quality

Overview
Journal J Nucl Med
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2005 May 6
PMID 15872361
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: With the advantages of the increased sensitivity of fully 3-dimensional (3D) PET for whole-body imaging come the challenges of more complicated quantitative corrections and, in particular, an increase in the number of random coincidences. The most common method of correcting for random coincidences is the real-time subtraction of a delayed coincidence channel, which does not add bias but increases noise. An alternative approach is the postacquisition subtraction of a low-noise random coincidence estimate, which can be obtained either from a smoothed delayed coincidence sinogram or from a calibration scan or directly estimated. Each method makes different trade-offs between noise amplification, bias, and data-processing requirements. These trade-offs are dependent on activity injected, the local imaging environment (e.g., near the bladder), and the reconstruction algorithm.

Methods: Using fully 3D whole-body simulations and phantom studies, we investigate how the gains in noise equivalent count (NEC) rates from using a noiseless random coincidence estimation method are translated to improvements in image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The image SNR, however, depends on the image reconstruction method and the local imaging environment.

Results: We show that for fully 3D whole-body imaging using a particular set of scanners and clinical protocols, a low-noise estimate of random coincidences improves sinogram and image SNRs by approximately 15% compared with online subtraction of delayed coincidences.

Conclusion: A 15% improvement in image SNR arises from a 32% increase in the NEC rate. Thus, scan duration can be reduced by 25% while still maintaining a constant total acquired NEC.

Citing Articles

High-resolution motion compensation for brain PET imaging using real-time electromagnetic motion tracking.

Tan W, Wang Z, Zeng X, Boccia A, Wang X, Li Y Med Phys. 2024; 52(1):201-218.

PMID: 39422495 PMC: 11716701. DOI: 10.1002/mp.17437.


Machine Learning in PET: from Photon Detection to Quantitative Image Reconstruction.

Gong K, Eric Berg , Cherry S, Qi J Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2023; 108(1):51-68.

PMID: 38045770 PMC: 10691821. DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2019.2936809.


Modified signal-to-noise ratio in the liver using the background-to-lung activity ratio to assess image quality of whole-body F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

Yamashita S, Okuda K, Nakaichi T, Yamamoto H, Yoneyama T, Yokoyama K Radiol Phys Technol. 2023; 16(1):94-101.

PMID: 36683121 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-023-00700-x.


Precision dosimetry in yttrium-90 radioembolization through CT imaging of radiopaque microspheres in a rabbit liver model.

Henry E, Strugari M, Mawko G, Brewer K, Liu D, Gordon A EJNMMI Phys. 2022; 9(1):21.

PMID: 35312882 PMC: 8938593. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-022-00447-1.


New standards for phantom image quality and SUV harmonization range for multicenter oncology PET studies.

Akamatsu G, Shimada N, Matsumoto K, Daisaki H, Suzuki K, Watabe H Ann Nucl Med. 2022; 36(2):144-161.

PMID: 35029817 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01709-1.