» Articles » PMID: 15857544

Physicians' Ability to Diagnose Sepsis in Newborns and Critically Ill Children

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2005 Apr 29
PMID 15857544
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To elucidate physicians' ability to correctly diagnose infection in critically ill children in three different situations: 1) post hoc adjudication (e.g., ward rounds, outcome determination in surveillance studies or controlled trials), 2) when decisions must be made (e.g., sepsis workup in suspected infection), c) and applying suggested adult consensus conference definitions in children.

Method: Appraisal of two previously published studies and a data simulation model.

Setting: Data of the reviewed studies were obtained from a multidisciplinary neonatal and a pediatric intensive care unit in tertiary hospitals.

Interventions: None.

Main Results: In the first study reviewed, the post hoc adjudication of 167 consecutive cases of suspected infection was carried out by a fifth-year medical student and three senior consultants. The agreement of the three experts beyond chance in the 119 episodes not classifiable unanimously by a priori defined criteria into proven sepsis or no infection was poor. In the second study reviewed, the physicians provided daily predictions of the likelihood of infection (pretest probability) in premature infants and critically ill children (2567 hospitalization days). Estimated pretest probabilities provided at the time of sepsis workup showed a remarkable predictive accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.85). In the simulation model, in which catheter-related sepsis was assumed, correct classification of patients from a central and a peripheral culture decreased to 56% when a sensitivity of 70%-80% was assumed for blood cultures and amounted to 15% only when a sensitivity of 30%-50% was imputed.

Conclusion: Misclassification is a serious threat in post hoc adjudication of episodes or when consensus definitions rely on the application of criteria with imperfect sensitivity (e.g., the positivity of blood cultures in premature infants or children). This underscores the need to use probability-based categorizations such as probable and possible infection.

Citing Articles

Antibiotic Resistance and Biofilm Infections in the NICUs and Methods to Combat It.

Baltogianni M, Giapros V, Kosmeri C Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 36830264 PMC: 9951928. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12020352.


Pediatric sepsis research in low- and middle-income countries: overcoming challenges.

de Souza D, Flauzino de Oliveira C, Lanziotti V Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022; 33(3):341-345.

PMID: 35107544 PMC: 8555391. DOI: 10.5935/0103-507X.20210062.


Towards understanding global patterns of antimicrobial use and resistance in neonatal sepsis: insights from the NeoAMR network.

Li G, Bielicki J, Nawshad Uddin Ahmed A, Islam M, Berezin E, Gallacci C Arch Dis Child. 2019; 105(1):26-31.

PMID: 31446393 PMC: 6951234. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-316816.


Prospective audit and feedback on antibiotic use in neonatal intensive care: a retrospective cohort study.

Thampi N, Shah P, Nelson S, Agarwal A, Steinberg M, Diambomba Y BMC Pediatr. 2019; 19(1):105.

PMID: 30975119 PMC: 6458619. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-019-1481-z.


Biomarker Phenotype for Early Diagnosis and Triage of Sepsis to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Mickiewicz B, Thompson G, Blackwood J, Jenne C, Winston B, Vogel H Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):16606.

PMID: 30413795 PMC: 6226431. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35000-7.