» Articles » PMID: 15849222

A Monoclonal Antibody Against HER-2 (trastuzumab) for Metastatic Breast Cancer: a Model-based Cost-effectiveness Analysis

Overview
Journal Ann Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2005 Apr 26
PMID 15849222
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). Trastuzumab has shown considerable activity in patients with MBC that overexpress HER2. However, significant resources have been allocated to finance this new therapy. Due to ever increasing pressures on health care budgets, economic evaluations are requested in order to compare health effects with costs.

Methods: All available data on trastuzumab in MBC presented at the San Antonio breast cancer conference in late 2003 and all data on Medline in December 2003 were analysed for life years (LY) gained and quality of life (QoL) with regard to the use of this new monoclonal antibody. Randomised studies comparing standard chemotherapy, with or without trastuzumab, were focused. The costs were calculated according to Norwegian prices as of January 2003.

Results: The LY gained ranged between 0.3 and 0.7 years. The median cost per patient treated was 44 196 yielding costs per life year saved in the range 63 137-162 417 depending on survival gain and discount rate employed. A sensitivity analysis documented the price of trastuzumab and the survival benefit the two major factors influencing the cost-effectiveness ratio.

Conclusion: The economic evaluation indicates that trastuzumab is not cost effective in metastatic breast cancer. Reduced drug costs and/or improved survival may alter the conclusion.

Citing Articles

Safety Profile of Monoclonal Antibody Compared With Traditional Anticancer Drugs: An Analysis of Henan Province Spontaneous Reporting System Database.

Jiao Z, Wang G, Feng Z, Yan Z, Zhang J, Li G Front Pharmacol. 2022; 12:760013.

PMID: 35145400 PMC: 8824435. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.760013.


Cost-effectiveness of treatments for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and associated metastases: an overview of systematic reviews.

Diaby V, Almutairi R, Babcock A, Moussa R, Ali A Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020; 21(3):353-364.

PMID: 33213205 PMC: 8765058. DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1848553.


Reviewing the quality, health benefit and value for money of chemotherapy and targeted therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Pouwels X, Ramaekers B, Joore M Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 165(3):485-498.

PMID: 28689361 PMC: 5602061. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4374-6.


Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Drugs in Early versus Late Stages of Cancer; Review of the Literature and a Case Study in Breast Cancer.

Dvortsin E, Gout-Zwart J, Eijssen E, van Brussel J, Postma M PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0146551.

PMID: 26800029 PMC: 4723090. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146551.


Targeting the low-hanging fruit of neurodegeneration.

Mason A, Ziemann A, Finkbeiner S Neurology. 2014; 83(16):1470-3.

PMID: 25313376 PMC: 4206158. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000894.