» Articles » PMID: 15837853

Occupation and Risk of Stomach Cancer in Poland

Overview
Date 2005 Apr 20
PMID 15837853
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In spite of the dramatic decline in the incidence of stomach cancer in the twentieth century, Poland has one of the highest rates in the world.

Aims: To evaluate the risk of stomach cancer by grouped occupations and industries, as well as by some specific occupational exposures.

Methods: Cases (n = 443) were newly diagnosed with stomach adenocarcinomas between 1994 and 1996. Controls (n = 479) were randomly selected from the general population in Warsaw.

Results: Only a few occupations and industries were associated with significantly increased risks of stomach cancer. The most suggestive finding was for work in the leather goods industry. Risk was also significantly increased among men working in fabricated metal production and among women ever employed as managers and governmental officials. Men ever employed as teaching professionals and women employed as technical and science professionals had significantly decreased risks of stomach cancer. Among men, a significant positive trend in risk with duration of employment was observed for work in the leather industry and special trade construction. No significantly increased risks were observed for specific exposures assessed by a job-exposure matrix or by self-reports. However among men there were non-significantly increased risks with 10 or more years exposure to asbestos, metal dust, and nitrosamines assessed by a job-exposure matrix.

Conclusions: Employment in the leather goods industry, special trade construction, and metal fabrication was associated with an increased risk of stomach cancer among men. However, there were only weak associations with specific exposures. Occupational exposures do not contribute substantially to the high rates of stomach cancer in Poland.

Citing Articles

Association of occupational heat exposure and colorectal cancer in the MCC-Spain study.

Hinchliffe A, Kogevinas M, Molina A, Moreno V, Aragones N, Castano-Vinyals G Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023; 49(3):211-221.

PMID: 36807489 PMC: 10621896. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4082.


Risk and Status of Gastrointestinal Cancer According to the International Standard Industrial Classification in Korean Workers.

Shin S, Choi J, Lee K, Yoon J, Lee W Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(20).

PMID: 36291948 PMC: 9600415. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205164.


Gastric cancer mortality rates by occupation and industry among male and female workers aged 25-64 years in Japan.

Yoshinaga Y, Tanaka H, Wada K, Ikeda S Ind Health. 2020; 58(6):554-564.

PMID: 32981909 PMC: 7708745. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2020-0136.


Increased risk of gastric cancer in workers with occupational dust exposure.

Kang M, Jung J, Koo J, Kim I, Kim H, Myong J Korean J Intern Med. 2020; 36(Suppl 1):S18-S26.

PMID: 32375207 PMC: 8009167. DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2019.421.


Occupational exposures and odds of gastric cancer: a StoP project consortium pooled analysis.

Shah S, Boffetta P, Johnson K, Hu J, Palli D, Ferraroni M Int J Epidemiol. 2020; 49(2):422-434.

PMID: 31965145 PMC: 10507679. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz263.


References
1.
Ekstrom A, Eriksson M, Hansson L, Lindgren A, Signorello L, Nyren O . Occupational exposures and risk of gastric cancer in a population-based case-control study. Cancer Res. 1999; 59(23):5932-7. View

2.
Pisani P, Parkin D, Bray F, Ferlay J . Estimates of the worldwide mortality from 25 cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer. 1999; 83(1):18-29. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990924)83:1<18::aid-ijc5>3.0.co;2-m. View

3.
Aragones N, Pollan M, Gustavsson P . Stomach cancer and occupation in Sweden: 1971-89. Occup Environ Med. 2002; 59(5):329-37. PMC: 1740284. DOI: 10.1136/oem.59.5.329. View

4.
Engel L, Vaughan T, Gammon M, Chow W, Risch H, Dubrow R . Occupation and risk of esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Am J Ind Med. 2002; 42(1):11-22. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.10077. View

5.
Correa P . Gastric neoplasia. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2002; 4(6):463-70. DOI: 10.1007/s11894-002-0022-2. View