» Articles » PMID: 15828880

Measuring Patient Acceptance of Implantable Cardiac Device Therapy: Initial Psychometric Investigation of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey

Overview
Date 2005 Apr 15
PMID 15828880
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Patient acceptance of implantable device therapy has been established as an important outcome but the operationalization and validation of a measure of patient acceptance of implantable device therapy has not been fully completed. This study sought to validate a new measure of patient acceptance of cardiac implantable devices called the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS).

Methods: The sample consisted of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD; n = 58), and implantable atrioverter defibrillator (ICD-AT; n = 96), and pacemaker (PM, n = 84) patients. Mean age of all participants was 69 years; they were mostly male (62%) and married (75%). The final FPAS comprised 15 items with four consistent factors: Return to Function, Device-Related Distress, Positive Appraisal, and Body Image Concerns.

Results: The total FPAS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83), and internal consistency for each of the subscales ranged from 0.74 to 0.89. The FPAS demonstrated convergent, divergent, and discriminant validity when compared to other self-report measures of QOL, atrial symptoms, depression, and anxiety. A total FPAS score can be formed and between group comparisons with this sample indicated that ICD patients report a high level of acceptance (mean = 76), ICD-AT patients report a significantly higher level of acceptance (mean = 81.1), and PM patients reported the highest level of patient acceptance (mean = 85.4) of these implantable device groups.

Conclusion: This initial psychometric investigation of the FPAS suggests that the FPAS may be useful in both clinical and research settings to assess patient acceptance of implantable cardiac devices.

Citing Articles

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey.

Bang C, Kwak J Nurs Open. 2025; 12(3):e70177.

PMID: 40064515 PMC: 11893192. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.70177.


Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire for use in Brazil.

Leao M, Nohara S, Fleury A, Jardim J J Bras Pneumol. 2024; 50(4):e20240030.

PMID: 39356909 PMC: 11449607. DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20240030.


Short- and long-term patient-reported outcomes of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: Results from the RHYTHM DETECT Registry.

Bisignani A, De Bonis S, Palmisano P, Bianchi V, Pecora D, Tola G Heart Rhythm O2. 2024; 5(7):474-478.

PMID: 39119026 PMC: 11305873. DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.05.009.


Patient Information Needs and Decision-Making Before a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device: A Qualitative Study Utilizing Social Media Data.

Nicmanis M, Holmes J, Oxlad M, Chur-Hansen A J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2024; .

PMID: 38773048 DOI: 10.1007/s10880-024-10024-6.


Predictors of Quality of Life, Anxiety and Acceptance in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.

Silva L, Silva K, Saucedo S, Costa R Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024; 121(4):e20230590.

PMID: 38695410 PMC: 11098579. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20230590.