» Articles » PMID: 15795377

Perceptual Learning in Clear Displays Optimizes Perceptual Expertise: Learning the Limiting Process

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2005 Mar 30
PMID 15795377
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human operators develop expertise in perceptual tasks by practice or perceptual learning. For noisy displays, practice improves performance by learned external-noise filtering. For clear displays, practice improves performance by improved amplification or enhancement of the stimulus. Can these two mechanisms of perceptual improvement be trained separately? In an orientation task, we found that training with clear displays generalized to performance in noisy displays, but we did not find the reverse to be true. In noisy displays, the noise in the stimulus limits performance. In clear displays, performance is limited by noisiness of internal representations and processes. Our results suggest that training in one display condition optimizes the limiting factor(s) in performance in that condition and that noise filtering is also improved by exposure to the stimulus in clear displays. The asymmetric pattern of transfer implies the existence of two independent mechanisms of perceptual learning, which may reflect channel re-weighting in adult visual system. These results also suggest that training operators with clear stimuli may suffice to improve performance in a range of clear and noisy environments by simultaneous learning by two mechanisms.

Citing Articles

Visual Perceptual Learning of Form-Motion Integration: Exploring the Involved Mechanisms with Transfer Effects and the Equivalent Noise Approach.

Donato R, Contillo A, Campana G, Roccato M, Goncalves O, Pavan A Brain Sci. 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39452011 PMC: 11506814. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14100997.


Transfer of visual perceptual learning over a task-irrelevant feature through feature-invariant representations: Behavioral experiments and model simulations.

Liu J, Lu Z, Dosher B J Vis. 2024; 24(6):17.

PMID: 38916886 PMC: 11205231. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.6.17.


The time course of stimulus-specific perceptual learning.

Bennett P, Hashemi A, Lass J, Sekuler A, Hussain Z J Vis. 2024; 24(4):9.

PMID: 38602837 PMC: 11019584. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.4.9.


Profiles of visual perceptual learning in feature space.

Shen S, Sun Y, Lu J, Li C, Chen Q, Mo C iScience. 2024; 27(3):109128.

PMID: 38384835 PMC: 10879700. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109128.


Bayesian approaches to smooth pursuit of random dot kinematograms: effects of varying RDK noise and the predictability of RDK direction.

Rubinstein J, Singh M, Kowler E J Neurophysiol. 2023; 131(2):394-416.

PMID: 38149327 PMC: 11551001. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00116.2023.


References
1.
Karni A, Sagi D . Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88(11):4966-70. PMC: 51788. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.11.4966. View

2.
Karni A, Sagi D . The time course of learning a visual skill. Nature. 1993; 365(6443):250-2. DOI: 10.1038/365250a0. View

3.
ANDERSON J, Fincham J . Acquisition of procedural skills from examples. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994; 20(6):1322-40. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.6.1322. View

4.
Lu Z, Liu C, Dosher B . Attention mechanisms for multi-location first- and second-order motion perception. Vision Res. 2000; 40(2):173-86. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00172-8. View

5.
Seitz A, Watanabe T . Psychophysics: Is subliminal learning really passive?. Nature. 2003; 422(6927):36. DOI: 10.1038/422036a. View