» Articles » PMID: 15793205

Reduced Hypoglycemia Risk with Insulin Glargine: a Meta-analysis Comparing Insulin Glargine with Human NPH Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes

Overview
Journal Diabetes Care
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2005 Mar 29
PMID 15793205
Citations 91
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Insulin glargine (LANTUS) is a once-daily basal insulin analog with a smooth 24-h time-action profile that provides effective glycemic control with reduced hypoglycemia risk (particularly nocturnal) compared with NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. A recent "treat-to-target" study has shown that more patients on insulin glargine reached HbA(1c) levels < or =7.0% without confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia compared with NPH insulin. We further assessed the risk for hypoglycemia in a meta-analysis of controlled trials of a similar design for insulin glargine versus once- or twice-daily NPH insulin in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Research Design And Methods: All studies were 24-28 weeks long, except one 52-week study, for which interim 20-week data were used.

Results: Patient demographics were similar between the insulin glargine (n = 1,142) and NPH insulin (n = 1,162) groups. The proportion of patients achieving target HbA(1c) (< or =7.0%) was similar between insulin glargine-and NPH insulin-treated patients (30.8 and 32.1%, respectively). There was a consistent significant reduction of hypoglycemia risk associated with insulin glargine, compared with NPH insulin, in terms of overall symptomatic (11%; P = 0.0006) and nocturnal (26%; P < 0.0001) hypoglycemia. Most notably, the risk of severe hypoglycemia and severe nocturnal hypoglycemia were reduced with insulin glargine by 46% (P = 0.0442) and 59% (P = 0.0231), respectively.

Conclusions: These results confirmed that insulin glargine given once daily reduces the risk of hypoglycemia compared with NPH insulin, which can facilitate more aggressive insulin treatment to a HbA(1c) target of < or =7.0% in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Citing Articles

Budget impact analysis of insulin glargine vs. isophane protamine insulin treatment for patients with type-2 diabetes and severe hypoglycemia in Thailand.

Permsuwan U, Deerochanawong C Front Public Health. 2025; 12:1415908.

PMID: 39877917 PMC: 11772286. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1415908.


Clinical perspectives on the frequency of hypoglycemia in treat-to-target randomized controlled trials comparing basal insulin analogs in type 2 diabetes: a narrative review.

Rosenstock J, Bajaj H, Lingvay I, Heller S BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38749508 PMC: 11097869. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003930.


The efficacy and safety of beinaglutide alone or in combination with insulin glargine in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are inadequately controlled with oral antihyperglycemic therapy: A multicenter, open-label, randomized trial.

Liu X, Yang W, Liu J, Huang X, Fang Y, Ming J J Diabetes. 2023; .

PMID: 37864379 PMC: 10850920. DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.13483.


Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of insulin aspart and glargine in type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus in Iran.

Nosrati M, Fariman S, Saiyarsarai P, Nikfar S J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2023; 22(1):817-825.

PMID: 37255793 PMC: 10225402. DOI: 10.1007/s40200-023-01209-1.


An introduction to insulin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Coetzee A S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2023; 65(1):e1-e5.

PMID: 37132569 PMC: 10157446. DOI: 10.4102/safp.v65i1.5702.