» Articles » PMID: 15782273

Risk-adjusted Analysis of Outcomes Following Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Overview
Journal Ann Vasc Surg
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2005 Mar 23
PMID 15782273
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe a method to analyze outcomes following open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair while considering the variability in patients' preoperative risk. Consecutive patients undergoing elective open infrarenal AAA repair during a 4-year period (2000-2003) were reviewed. Thirty-day or in-hospital mortality was the major outcome variable. Preoperative mortality risk was estimated for each patient using a validated scoring system that considers age, renal dysfunction, and coronary artery and cerebrovascular disease. A risk-adjusted cumulative sum method was used to compare observed versus predicted outcomes by assigning a risk-adjusted score, based on log-likelihood ratios, to each patient. These cumulative scores were sequentially plotted with preset control limits to allow for "signaling" when results were substantially different than expected (doubling or halving of odds ratios). Four hundred and sixty-three patients were studied with an overall early mortality rate of 4.5% (n = 21). Patients were allocated to three different preoperative risk groups (low, n = 89; medium, n = 160; high, n = 214) according to a medical comorbidity-based scoring system. Predicted (P) and observed (O) mortality rates for each group were as follows: low, 2.4% (P) and 2.2% (O); medium, 4.1% (P) and 4.4% (O); high, 9.3% (P) and 5.6% (O). The resulting risk-adjusted scores for each patient were plotted sequentially. This plot was flat for the first year and then adopted a negative slope crossing the lower control limit after 266 patients, indicating improved results compared to those expected. This coincided with the adoption of routine intraoperative cell saver use in our practice. This form of analysis allows for the prospective evaluation of results while considering patient-mix variabilities.

Citing Articles

Systematic methods for measuring outcomes: How they may be used to improve outcomes after Radical cystectomy.

Siddiqui K, Izawa J Arab J Urol. 2015; 13(2):122-7.

PMID: 26413333 PMC: 4561925. DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.02.008.


Defining high-risk patients for endovascular aneurysm repair.

Egorova N, Giacovelli J, Gelijns A, Greco G, Moskowitz A, McKinsey J J Vasc Surg. 2009; 50(6):1271-9.e1.

PMID: 19782526 PMC: 3081634. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.061.


CUSUM analysis of J-pouch surgery reflects no learning curve after board certification.

H D Colquhoun P Can J Surg. 2008; 51(4):296-9.

PMID: 18815654 PMC: 2552948.


Elective surgery for aortic abdominal aneurysm: comparison of English outcomes with those elsewhere.

Filipovic M, Goldacre M, Gill L J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007; 61(3):226-31.

PMID: 17325400 PMC: 2652916. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2006.047001.