» Articles » PMID: 15781738

Sirolimus-eluting Stents to Abolish Intimal Hyperplasia and Improve Flow in Porcine Arteriovenous Grafts: a 4-week Follow-up Study

Overview
Journal Circulation
Date 2005 Mar 23
PMID 15781738
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The patency of arteriovenous (AV) expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) hemodialysis grafts is severely compromised by intimal hyperplasia (IH) at the venous anastomosis and in the venous outflow tract. We addressed the potential of primary placement of a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in a validated porcine model.

Methods And Results: In 25 pigs, ePTFE AV grafts were created bilaterally between the carotid artery and the jugular vein, whereupon a self-expandable nitinol stent (14 SESs and 11 bare-metal stents) was implanted over the venous anastomosis in 1 of the 2 grafts. After exclusion of technical failures and 1 unilateral occlusion, 16 pigs (9 SESs and 7 bare-metal stents) were included for further analysis. After 28 days, we measured graft flow and performed quantitative angiography. The pigs were then euthanized, and grafts with adjacent vessels were excised for histological analysis. Minimal luminal diameter was substantially larger in the SES group compared with unstented controls (5.9+/-0.2 versus 3.8+/-0.4 mm, respectively, P=0.01), which was accompanied by more prominent graft flow (SES, 1360+/-89 mL/min versus unstented, 861+/-83 mL/min, P=0.05). IH at the venous anastomosis was 77% less in the SES group compared with unstented controls (0.44+/-0.05 versus 1.92+/-0.5 mm2, respectively, P=0.01), whereas IH increased markedly when bare-metal stents were used (5.7+/-1.4 mm2, P=0.05).

Conclusions: SESs in the venous outflow of AV grafts significantly reduce IH and increase vessel diameter and graft flow compared with unstented grafts. These findings suggest that SESs have the potential to improve primary patency of AV grafts in hemodialysis patients.

Citing Articles

Intimal growth on the luminal surface of arteriovenous grafts in rats.

Ono S, Hatayama N, Miyamoto K, Naito M, Ishimoto T, Ito Y Clin Exp Nephrol. 2023; 27(5):402-410.

PMID: 36773176 DOI: 10.1007/s10157-023-02320-6.


The molecular mechanisms of hemodialysis vascular access failure.

Brahmbhatt A, Remuzzi A, Franzoni M, Misra S Kidney Int. 2016; 89(2):303-316.

PMID: 26806833 PMC: 4734360. DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2015.12.019.


A Patient with Recurrent Arteriovenous Graft Thrombosis.

Allon M Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015; 10(12):2255-62.

PMID: 25883073 PMC: 4670757. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00190115.


Novel therapies for hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction: myth or reality?.

Terry C, Dember L Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013; 8(12):2202-12.

PMID: 24235283 PMC: 3848408. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.07360713.


Novel paradigms for dialysis vascular access: downstream vascular biology--is there a final common pathway?.

Lee T Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013; 8(12):2194-201.

PMID: 23990166 PMC: 3848398. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.03490413.