» Articles » PMID: 1577845

Antiproliferative Activity of Vinorelbine (Navelbine) Against Six Human Melanoma Cell Lines

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 1992 Jan 1
PMID 1577845
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We compared in vitro the cytotoxic activity of vinorelbine (VRB) (Navelbine, 5'-nor-anhydro-vinblastine) a novel Vinca alkaloid, with that of vinblastine (VBL) vincristine (VCR) and vindesine (VDS). Five continuous human melanoma cell lines (C32, G361, StMl11a, StMl12d and StMl14a) and a new line WHMel 1, were used in this study. In growth-inhibition assays, VDS and VRB exhibited comparable cytotoxicity against the C32 and G361 melanoma lines; the effect being dose- and time-dependent. VRB appeared less inhibitory compared to VDS in the lowest concentrations (0.1-1 nM). The same activity was observed with 0.1-1 microM. These drugs exhibited comparable growth inhibition at clinically achievable doses. The MTT assay was used to compare VBL, VCR, VDS, and VRB. Overall IC50 values (concentration required to reduce viability by 50%) ranged from 1 pM to 10 nM. The reduction in cell viability with VRB was similar to that observed with the reference drugs in four out of five lines tested by this method. However a trend was observed for IC50 values to be lower with VBL and VDS. In clonogenic assays (StMl11a, StMl12d and StMl14a lines, 1 h exposure) VRB and VDS produced the same reduction in survival. Survival curves were exponential followed by a terminal plateau. IC50 values ranged from 60 nM to 70 nM. Our results indicate that VRB has in vitro activity against six melanoma lines with differing phenotypic characteristics.

Citing Articles

Mind the Curve: Dose-Response Fitting Biases the Synergy Scores across Software Used for Chemotherapy Combination Studies.

Fuentealba-Manosalva O, Mansilla M, Buelvas N, Martin-Martin A, Torres C, Lopez-Munoz R Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(11).

PMID: 37298656 PMC: 10253300. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24119705.


VEGF neutralizing antibody increases the therapeutic efficacy of vinorelbine for renal cell carcinoma.

Sinha S, Cao Y, Dutta S, Wang E, Mukhopadhyay D J Cell Mol Med. 2008; 14(3):647-58.

PMID: 19017359 PMC: 2992850. DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00578.x.


Cell cycle checkpoint models for cellular pharmacology of paclitaxel and platinum drugs.

El-Kareh A, Labes R, Secomb T AAPS J. 2008; 10(1):15-34.

PMID: 18446502 PMC: 2751448. DOI: 10.1208/s12248-007-9003-6.


Vinorelbine: a review of its use in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Curran M, Plosker G Drugs Aging. 2002; 19(9):695-721.

PMID: 12381238 DOI: 10.2165/00002512-200219090-00006.


Vinorelbine. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical use in cancer chemotherapy.

Goa K, Faulds D Drugs Aging. 1994; 5(3):200-34.

PMID: 7803948 DOI: 10.2165/00002512-199405030-00006.

References
1.
Potier P . The synthesis of Navelbine prototype of a new series of vinblastine derivatives. Semin Oncol. 1989; 16(2 Suppl 4):2-4. View

2.
Langlois N, Gueritte F, Langlois Y, Potier P . Application of a modification of the Polonovski reaction to the synthesis of vinblastine-type alkaloids. J Am Chem Soc. 1976; 98(22):7017-24. DOI: 10.1021/ja00438a046. View

3.
Binet S, Fellous A, Lataste H, KRIKORIAN A, Couzinier J, Meininger V . In situ analysis of the action of Navelbine on various types of microtubules using immunofluorescence. Semin Oncol. 1989; 16(2 Suppl 4):5-8. View

4.
Roper P, Drewinko B . Comparison of in vitro methods to determine drug-induced cell lethality. Cancer Res. 1976; 36(7 PT 1):2182-8. View

5.
Alley M, Scudiero D, Monks A, Hursey M, Czerwinski M, Fine D . Feasibility of drug screening with panels of human tumor cell lines using a microculture tetrazolium assay. Cancer Res. 1988; 48(3):589-601. View