» Articles » PMID: 15761206

Are Lacunar Strokes Really Different? A Systematic Review of Differences in Risk Factor Profiles Between Lacunar and Nonlacunar Infarcts

Overview
Journal Stroke
Date 2005 Mar 12
PMID 15761206
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Differences in risk factors between lacunar and nonlacunar infarcts might support a distinct arterial pathological process underlying lacunar infarction.

Methods: We did a systematic review of studies comparing risk factors in patients with lacunar versus nonlacunar infarction. For each risk factor, we calculated study-specific and pooled relative risks (RRs) for lacunar versus nonlacunar infarction.

Results: A total of 16 of 28 studies included risk factors in their ischemic stroke subtype definitions. Hypertension and diabetes appeared commoner among patients with lacunar versus nonlacunar infarction. However, analyses confined to studies using risk factor-free ischemic subtype definitions found only a marginal excess of hypertension with lacunar versus nonlacunar infarction (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.19) and no difference for diabetes (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.09). Atrial fibrillation and carotid stenosis were associated more with nonlacunar than lacunar infarction but less so when only studies using risk factor-free classifications were considered. Otherwise, there was no evidence of differences in risk factor profiles.

Conclusions: Risk factor-free ischemic stroke subtype classification methods should be used for comparing risk factor profiles between lacunar and nonlacunar subtypes.

Citing Articles

Stroke etiology and white matter burden in women with and without migraine.

Wilms A, van der Weerd N, van Harten T, Linstra K, van Os H, de Boer I J Headache Pain. 2025; 26(1):37.

PMID: 39972322 PMC: 11841335. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-025-01975-8.


Acceleration of brain aging after small-volume infarcts.

Peng Y, Kuo C, Chang S, Lin C, Tsai Y Front Aging Neurosci. 2024; 16:1409166.

PMID: 39391585 PMC: 11464776. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1409166.


CT Perfusion imaging as prognostic factor for outcome of lacunar stroke.

Mausbach S, Abdallah L, Ben-David E, Teitcher M, Bornstein N, Eichel R Neuroradiology. 2024; 66(12):2223-2231.

PMID: 39387917 PMC: 11611928. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-024-03480-2.


Stroke Subtype Among Individuals With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Noor S, Bota S, Clarke A, Petrcich W, Kelly D, Knoll G Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2023; 10:20543581231203046.

PMID: 37841343 PMC: 10576427. DOI: 10.1177/20543581231203046.


14-day Holter monitoring for atrial fibrillation after ischemic stroke: The yield of guideline-recommended monitoring duration.

Himmelreich J, Lucassen W, Coutinho J, Harskamp R, de Groot J, Cpm van Weert H Eur Stroke J. 2023; 8(1):157-167.

PMID: 37021150 PMC: 10069211. DOI: 10.1177/23969873221146027.


References
1.
Falcone R, Shapiro E, Jangula J, Johnson C . Transesophageal echocardiographic findings in subcortical and cortical stroke. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 85(1):121-4, A9. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00623-2. View

2.
Saposnik G, Caplan L, Gonzalez L, Baird A, Dashe J, Luraschi A . Differences in stroke subtypes among natives and caucasians in Boston and Buenos Aires. Stroke. 2000; 31(10):2385-9. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.31.10.2385. View

3.
Nagai Y, Kitagawa K, Sakaguchi M, Shimizu Y, Hashimoto H, Yamagami H . Significance of earlier carotid atherosclerosis for stroke subtypes. Stroke. 2001; 32(8):1780-5. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.32.8.1780. View

4.
Goldstein L, Jones M, Matchar D, Edwards L, Hoff J, Chilukuri V . Improving the reliability of stroke subgroup classification using the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria. Stroke. 2001; 32(5):1091-8. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.32.5.1091. View

5.
Saposnik G, Gonzalez L, Lepera S, Luraschi A, Sica R, Caplan L . Southern Buenos Aires stroke project. Acta Neurol Scand. 2001; 104(3):130-5. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2001.00039.x. View