» Articles » PMID: 1576052

The Influence of Codeine, Propantheline and Metoclopramide on Small Bowel Transit and Theophylline Absorption from a Sustained-release Formulation

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1992 Mar 1
PMID 1576052
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1. The effects of the anticholinergic agent, propantheline, the opiate, codeine, and the prokinetic agent, metoclopramide, on oral-caecal transit time and on the absorption of theophylline from a sustained-release formulation were examined in six healthy male volunteers. 2. A cross-over randomised sequence design was followed, allowing at least 2 weeks interval between studies. On each occasion 500 mg theophylline in a sustained-release formulation was taken simultaneously with 2 g sulphasalazine at zero time. On three of the four occasions one of the following treatments was given concurrently at -0.5 h, +3.5 h, and +7.5 h: 30 mg codeine phosphate, 30 mg propantheline bromide, or 10 mg metoclopramide monohydrochloride. 3. The appearance of sulphapyridine in the plasma was used to assess oral-caecal transit time and the mean fraction absorbed-time profile of theophylline was calculated from serial serum theophylline concentration measurements using the Wagner-Nelson method. 4. Codeine increased the mean (s.d.) oral-caecal time (h) significantly (5.14 +/- 0.94) compared with the control value (3.78 +/- 0.34). Propantheline inhibited peristaltic contractions to such an extent that the oral-caecal transit time in five of the volunteers was between 9 and 25 h, while sulphapyridine appeared in the 9 h serum sample of the sixth. Metoclopramide did not significantly alter the oral-caecal transit time. 5. Despite the observed changes in oral-caecal transit time the rate and extent of theophylline absorption was similar with all regimens.

References
1.
KOSTERLITZ H, Lees G . PHARMACOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF INTRINSIC INTESTINAL REFLEXES. Pharmacol Rev. 1964; 16:301-39. View

2.
Paton W . The action of morphine and related substances on contraction and on acetylcholine output of coaxially stimulated guinea-pig ileum. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1957; 12(1):119-27. PMC: 1509640. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1957.tb01373.x. View

3.
Fernandez A, Massingham R . Peripheral receptor populations involved in the regulation of gastrointestinal motility and the pharmacological actions of metoclopramide-like drugs. Life Sci. 1985; 36(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(85)90280-2. View

4.
Staniforth D . Comparison of orocaecal transit times assessed by the lactulose/breath hydrogen and the sulphasalazine/sulphapyridine methods. Gut. 1989; 30(7):978-82. PMC: 1434296. DOI: 10.1136/gut.30.7.978. View

5.
Davis S, Hardy J, Fara J . Transit of pharmaceutical dosage forms through the small intestine. Gut. 1986; 27(8):886-92. PMC: 1433369. DOI: 10.1136/gut.27.8.886. View