Does the Anterior Cruciate Have a Modeling Threshold? A Case for the Affirmative

Growing evidence supports a 1972 proposal that dynamic tension strains of a ligament above a threshold range, but below its ultimate strength, would make its cells synthesize more collagen to thicken and strengthen it. If so, when that strengthening reduced later strains to the bottom of that threshold range this "diametric modeling" would stop. A) Such a mechanism must create a "strength-safety factor" that would minimize or prevent voluntary activities from rupturing healthy ligaments, so chiefly injuries would rupture them. B) Such a mechanism should also make the usual largest loads on a healthy anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) determine its strength, and would make smaller loads mixed with large ones have little effect on its strength. C) In principle, when an ACL's strains exceeded that threshold range, diametric modeling would turn on, strengthen it, and reduce subsequent strains from the same loads. When its strains remained smaller, this mechanically-controlled modeling would turn off. Normal ACLs do have a strength-safety factor so they could have a diametric modeling threshold too, as we now know bone does. In healthy young adult humans available evidence suggests that threshold's value could lie in the region of 23 Newtons/mmC of the ACL's cross section area. If similar relationships applied to fascia, tendons and other ligaments (I suggest they do), they would form fundamental biomechanical properties of collagenous tissue organs.