» Articles » PMID: 15755755

Model of Outcomes of Screening Mammography: Information to Support Informed Choices

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2005 Mar 10
PMID 15755755
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To provide easy to use estimates of the benefits and harms of biennial screening mammography for women aged 40, 50, 60, and 70 years.

Design: Markov process model, with data from BreastScreen Australia, the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, and the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Main Outcome Measure: Age specific outcomes expressed per 1000 women over 10 years.

Results: For every 1000 women screened over 10 years, 167-251 (depending on age) receive an abnormal result; 56-64 of these women undergo at least one biopsy, 9-26 have an invasive cancer detected by screening, and 3-6 have ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) detected by screening. More breast cancers (both invasive and DCIS) are diagnosed among screened than unscreened women. For example, among 1000 women aged 50 who have five biennial screens, 33 breast cancers are diagnosed: 28 invasive cancers (18 detected at screening and 10 interval cancers) and five DCIS (all detected at screening). By comparison, among 1000 women aged 50 who decline screening, 20 cancers are diagnosed over 10 years. There are about 0.5, 2, 3, and 2 fewer deaths from breast cancer over 10 years per 1000 women aged 40, 50, 60, and 70, respectively, who choose to be screened compared with women who decline screening at times determined by relevant policy.

Conclusion: Benefits and harms of screening mammography are relatively finely balanced. Quantitative estimates such as these can be used to support individual informed choices about screening.

Citing Articles

Patient preferences for breast cancer screening: a systematic review update to inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Pillay J, Guitard S, Rahman S, Saba S, Rahman A, Bialy L Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):140.

PMID: 38807191 PMC: 11134964. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02539-8.


Impact of a risk based breast screening decision aid on understanding, acceptance and decision making.

Lippey J, Keogh L, Campbell I, Mann G, Forrest L NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023; 9(1):65.

PMID: 37553371 PMC: 10409718. DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00569-4.


Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography: a cohort study with follow-up of 12-14 years in Denmark.

Gram E, Siersma V, Brandt Brodersen J BMJ Open. 2023; 13(4):e072188.

PMID: 37185642 PMC: 10151842. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072188.


Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid.

Braithwaite D, Chicaiza A, Lopez K, Lin K, Mishori R, Karanth S PEC Innov. 2023; 2.

PMID: 37124453 PMC: 10136373. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100132.


Considerations for Evaluating the Introduction of New Cancer Screening Technology: Use of Interval Cancers to Assess Potential Benefits and Harms.

Farber R, Houssami N, Barnes I, McGeechan K, Barratt A, Bell K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(22).

PMID: 36429373 PMC: 9691207. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192214647.


References
1.
Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin S, Sandrock C, Ernster V . Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1995; 273(2):149-54. View

2.
Glasziou P . Meta-analysis adjusting for compliance: the example of screening for breast cancer. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45(11):1251-6. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90166-k. View

3.
Welch H, Albertsen P, Nease R, Bubolz T, Wasson J . Estimating treatment benefits for the elderly: the effect of competing risks. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 124(6):577-84. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-6-199603150-00007. View

4.
Chen H, Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Duffy S . Effect of breast cancer screening after age 65. J Med Screen. 1995; 2(1):10-4. DOI: 10.1177/096914139500200104. View

5.
Barratt A, Trevena L, Davey H, McCaffery K . Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening. BMJ. 2004; 329(7464):507-10. PMC: 515211. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7464.507. View