» Articles » PMID: 15754735

Cost-of-illness Study in Acromegalic Patients in Italy

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2005 Mar 10
PMID 15754735
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: acromegalic therapeutic goals are directed at removing the tumor, preventing tumor re-growth and reducing long-term morbidity and mortality. In this scenario, the acromegalic patient needs a variety of health resources (diagnostic tests, surgery, radiotherapy, specialist visits and drugs) for his/her cure, in order to decrease/stop the progression of the disease and to cure the co-morbid diseases. Lack of epidemiological data has suggested performing an Italian retrospective study aiming to assess the health resource consumption that is caused by acromegalic cure and the relative co-morbidities, in order to estimate the amount of the direct costs of acromegalic patients.

Method: a retrospective study was performed on a total of 134 patients (142 patients selected, 76 in Genoa and 66 in Turin) for a period of about 7 yr preceding the enrolment date. Only direct costs were evaluated by performing an analysis on the perspective of Italian Healthcare Service (SSN).

Results: the mean total direct costs for acromegaly cure ranged from 7,968.41 to 12,533.02 Euros/yr (p < 0.01; Mann Whitney Test), respectively, for Responders and Non-Responders. The cost driver was drug (SS analogs) for acromegalic cure. The co-morbidity conditions associated to acromegalic Non-Responder patients are clearly higher than those with well-controlled disease.

Conclusion: the study supports the hypothesis that controlled patients drove a saving for SSN in comparison to poor control patients that use more health resources.

Citing Articles

Costs and Its Determinants in Pituitary Tumour Surgery.

Dekkers A, de Vries F, Zamanipoor Najafabadi A, van der Hoeven E, Verstegen M, Pereira A Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13:905019.

PMID: 35872986 PMC: 9302462. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.905019.


Evaluation of acromegaly treatment direct costs with respect to biochemical control and follow-up length.

Cocchiara F, Campana C, Nista F, Corica G, Ceraudo M, Milioto A Pituitary. 2021; 25(2):246-257.

PMID: 34757473 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-021-01193-w.


Large Scale Molecular Studies of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Novel Markers, Mechanisms and Translational Perspectives.

Peculis R, Niedra H, Rovite V Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(6).

PMID: 33808624 PMC: 8003417. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061395.


Healthcare utilization and costs among prolactinoma patients: a cross-sectional study and analysis of determinants.

van der Meulen M, Zamanipoor Najafabadi A, Lobatto D, van den Hout W, Andela C, Zandbergen I Pituitary. 2020; 24(1):79-95.

PMID: 33025546 PMC: 7864816. DOI: 10.1007/s11102-020-01089-1.


Clinical presentation and management of acromegaly in elderly patients.

Ceccato F, Barbot M, Lizzul L, Cuccarollo A, Selmin E, Merante Boschin I Hormones (Athens). 2020; 20(1):143-150.

PMID: 32840821 PMC: 7889670. DOI: 10.1007/s42000-020-00235-5.


References
1.
Swearingen B, Barker 2nd F, Katznelson L, Biller B, Grinspoon S, Klibanski A . Long-term mortality after transsphenoidal surgery and adjunctive therapy for acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998; 83(10):3419-26. DOI: 10.1210/jcem.83.10.5222. View

2.
Eastman R, Gorden P, Roth J . Conventional supervoltage irradiation is an effective treatment for acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1979; 48(6):931-40. DOI: 10.1210/jcem-48-6-931. View

3.
Freda P, Wardlaw S . Primary medical therapy for acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998; 83(9):3031-3. DOI: 10.1210/jcem.83.9.5145. View

4.
Rajasoorya C, Holdaway I, WRIGHTSON P, Scott D, IBBERTSON H . Determinants of clinical outcome and survival in acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1994; 41(1):95-102. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1994.tb03789.x. View

5.
Melmed S . Acromegaly. N Engl J Med. 1990; 322(14):966-77. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199004053221405. View