» Articles » PMID: 15747676

An Assessment of Crown-to-root Ratios with Short Sintered Porous-surfaced Implants Supporting Prostheses in Partially Edentulous Patients

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2005 Mar 8
PMID 15747676
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Implant length, implant surface area, and crown-to-root (c/r) ratio and their relationship to crestal bone levels were analyzed in 2 groups of partially edentulous patients treated with sintered porous-surfaced dental implants.

Materials And Methods: One hundred ninety-nine implants were used to restore 74 partially edentulous patients with fixed prostheses. Implants were categorized according to their length ("short" versus "long") and estimated surface area ("small" versus "large"). "Short" implants had lengths of 5 or 7 mm, while "long" implants were either 9 or 12 mm in length. "Small" implants had estimated surface areas of < or = 600 mm2, while "large" implants had estimated surface areas > 600 mm2. Other data collected included c/r ratio (measured on articulated diagnostic casts), whether or not the implants were splinted, and standardized sequential radiographs.

Results: The mean c/r ratio was 1.5 (SD = 0.4; range 0.8 to 3.0), with 78.9% of the implants having a c/r ratio between 1.1 and 2.0. Neither c/r ratio nor estimated implant surface area (small or large) affected steady-state crestal bone levels. However, implant length and whether the implants were splinted did appear to affect bone levels. Long implants had greater crestal bone loss (0.2 mm more) than short implants; splinted implants showed greater crestal bone loss (0.2 mm more) than nonsplinted ones. These differences were statistically significant.

Discussion And Conclusions: Sintered porous-surfaced implants performed well in short lengths (7 mm or less) in this series of partially edentulous patients. The data suggested that long implants and/or splinting can result in greater crestal bone loss; longer implants and splinted implants appeared to favor greater crestal bone loss in this investigation. These conclusions are, of course, specific to the implants used and would not be relevant to other implant types.

Citing Articles

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for Influence of Variation in Dental Implant Dimensions (Length and Diameter) on Peri-implant Bone Stress/Strain Distribution: A Systematic Review.

Sayed A, Mohsin S, Garg K, Agwan M, Tareen S, Alruthea M Pak J Med Sci. 2025; 41(1):318-330.

PMID: 39867800 PMC: 11755290. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.41.1.8991.


A pattern of peri-implantitis affecting middle implants in 3-implant splinted prostheses.

Prete B, Silva M, Wong B, Deporter D Clin Adv Periodontics. 2023; 14(4):284-289.

PMID: 38009281 PMC: 11718349. DOI: 10.1002/cap.10274.


A Comparative Evaluation of the Strain Transmitted through Prostheses on Implants with Two Different Macro-Structures and Connection during Insertion and Loading Phase: An In Vitro Study.

Kassem R, Samara A, Biadsee A, Masarwa S, Mtanis T, Ormianer Z Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(14).

PMID: 35888421 PMC: 9322821. DOI: 10.3390/ma15144954.


Effect of crown-to-implant ratio and crown height space on marginal bone stress: a finite element analysis.

Ferreira J, Machado L, Oliveira J, Ramos J Int J Implant Dent. 2021; 7(1):81.

PMID: 34467461 PMC: 8408299. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00368-1.


The rehabilitation of posterior atrophic maxilla by using the graftless option of short implant versus conventional long implant with sinus graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trial.

Chaware S, Thakare V, Chaudhary R, Jankar A, Thakkar S, Borse S J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021; 21(1):28-44.

PMID: 33835066 PMC: 8061432. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_400_20.