» Articles » PMID: 15741185

Human Pol II Promoter Prediction: Time Series Descriptors and Machine Learning

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2005 Mar 3
PMID 15741185
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although several in silico promoter prediction methods have been developed to date, they are still limited in predictive performance. The limitations are due to the challenge of selecting appropriate features of promoters that distinguish them from non-promoters and the generalization or predictive ability of the machine-learning algorithms. In this paper we attempt to define a novel approach by using unique descriptors and machine-learning methods for the recognition of eukaryotic polymerase II promoters. In this study, non-linear time series descriptors along with non-linear machine-learning algorithms, such as support vector machine (SVM), are used to discriminate between promoter and non-promoter regions. The basic idea here is to use descriptors that do not depend on the primary DNA sequence and provide a clear distinction between promoter and non-promoter regions. The classification model built on a set of 1000 promoter and 1500 non-promoter sequences, showed a 10-fold cross-validation accuracy of 87% and an independent test set had an accuracy >85% in both promoter and non-promoter identification. This approach correctly identified all 20 experimentally verified promoters of human chromosome 22. The high sensitivity and selectivity indicates that n-mer frequencies along with non-linear time series descriptors, such as Lyapunov component stability and Tsallis entropy, and supervised machine-learning methods, such as SVMs, can be useful in the identification of pol II promoters.

Citing Articles

Critical assessment of computational tools for prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoter prediction.

Zhang M, Jia C, Li F, Li C, Zhu Y, Akutsu T Brief Bioinform. 2022; 23(2).

PMID: 35021193 PMC: 8921625. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab551.


Computational identification of eukaryotic promoters based on cascaded deep capsule neural networks.

Zhu Y, Li F, Xiang D, Akutsu T, Song J, Jia C Brief Bioinform. 2020; 22(4).

PMID: 33227813 PMC: 8522485. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa299.


Rule-based knowledge acquisition method for promoter prediction in human and Drosophila species.

Huang W, Tung C, Liaw C, Huang H, Ho S ScientificWorldJournal. 2014; 2014:327306.

PMID: 24955394 PMC: 3927563. DOI: 10.1155/2014/327306.


Eukaryotic and prokaryotic promoter prediction using hybrid approach.

Lin H, Li Q Theory Biosci. 2010; 130(2):91-100.

PMID: 21046474 DOI: 10.1007/s12064-010-0114-8.


Features of mammalian microRNA promoters emerge from polymerase II chromatin immunoprecipitation data.

Corcoran D, Pandit K, Gordon B, Bhattacharjee A, Kaminski N, Benos P PLoS One. 2009; 4(4):e5279.

PMID: 19390574 PMC: 2668758. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005279.


References
1.
Feinstein A, Cicchetti D . High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990; 43(6):543-9. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-l. View

2.
Bajic V, Seah S, Chong A, Zhang G, Koh J, Brusic V . Dragon Promoter Finder: recognition of vertebrate RNA polymerase II promoters. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18(1):198-9. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.1.198. View

3.
Abe S, Suzuki N . Itineration of the Internet over nonequilibrium stationary states in Tsallis statistics. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003; 67(1 Pt 2):016106. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.016106. View

4.
Liu H, Yang Y, Dai Z, Yu Z . The largest Lyapunov exponent of chaotic dynamical system in scale space and its application. Chaos. 2003; 13(3):839-44. DOI: 10.1063/1.1596556. View

5.
Gordon L, Chervonenkis A, Gammerman A, Shahmuradov I, Solovyev V . Sequence alignment kernel for recognition of promoter regions. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19(15):1964-71. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg265. View