» Articles » PMID: 1573985

Application of Logistic Regression to the Analysis of Diagnostic Data: Exact Modeling of a Probability Tree of Multiple Binary Variables

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 1992 Apr 1
PMID 1573985
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the analysis and presentation of diagnostic relationships by means of conventional multiple logistic regression, the following limitations occur: 1) the model starts not from the prior disease odds but from the posterior disease odds for all test variables having a zero value; 2) apart from the odds ratio, other test characteristics cannot be read from the model; 3) the sequence of entering of terms is guided by pure statistical criteria and not primarily by the criterion gain in certainty; 4) interactions are not very comprehensibly represented and are difficult to interpret. A method dealing with these limitations with respect to the analysis of data on the relationships between binary tests and disease outcome is described. Essential is the transformation of any test variable x to (x - x0), where x0 is that specific (virtual) value of x so that: posterior disease odds = prior disease odds, and consequently LRx0 = 1. Moreover, a simple branching structure is introduced while the terms are entered in order of decreasing gain in certainty. Examples are given for one-, two-, and three-test situations with and without dependency and interaction of tests, and general formulas are presented. For situations with the same prior probability, and the same overall discrimination of the separate test variables, all equations clearly have a common basis. Inclusion of new variables does not affect coefficients previously included in the model, and terms without a significant contribution can be skipped without affecting other coefficients. Standard errors and confidence intervals of test characteristics can be computed using the BMDP LR program. Further study needs to be done on the inclusion of continuous variables and cost-benefit aspects, and comparison with the performance of the CART program.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Bayesian approaches for developing prediction models in rare disease: application to the identification of patients with Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young.

Cardoso P, McDonald T, Patel K, Pearson E, Hattersley A, Shields B BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):128.

PMID: 38834992 PMC: 11149229. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02239-w.


Predicting Diagnosis of Australian Canine and Feline Urinary Bladder Disease Based on Histologic Features.

Jones E, Alawneh J, Thompson M, Palmieri C, Jackson K, Allavena R Vet Sci. 2020; 7(4).

PMID: 33260976 PMC: 7712252. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci7040190.


Establishment and verification of a surgical prognostic model for cervical spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality.

Wang J, Guo S, Cai X, Xu J, Li H Neural Regen Res. 2019; 14(4):713-720.

PMID: 30632513 PMC: 6352577. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.247480.


A genetic programming approach to development of clinical prediction models: A case study in symptomatic cardiovascular disease.

Bannister C, Halcox J, Currie C, Preece A, Spasic I PLoS One. 2018; 13(9):e0202685.

PMID: 30180175 PMC: 6122798. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202685.


The value of signs, symptoms and plasma heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) in evaluating patients presenting with symptoms possibly matching acute coronary syndrome: background and methods of a diagnostic study in primary care.

Willemsen R, Buntinx F, Winkens B, Glatz J, Dinant G BMC Fam Pract. 2015; 15:203.

PMID: 25738970 PMC: 4272772. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-014-0203-8.