» Articles » PMID: 15738488

Characteristics of Women Undergoing Repeat Induced Abortion

Overview
Journal CMAJ
Date 2005 Mar 2
PMID 15738488
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although repeat induced abortion is common, data concerning characteristics of women undergoing this procedure are lacking. We conducted this study to identify the characteristics, including history of physical abuse by a male partner and history of sexual abuse, of women who present for repeat induced abortion.

Methods: We surveyed a consecutive series of women presenting for initial or repeat pregnancy termination to a regional provider of abortion services for a wide geographic area in southwestern Ontario between August 1998 and May 1999. Self-reported demographic characteristics, attitudes and practices regarding contraception, history of relationship violence, history of sexual abuse or coercion, and related variables were assessed as potential correlates of repeat induced abortion. We used chi2 tests for linear trend to examine characteristics of women undergoing a first, second, or third or subsequent abortion. We analyzed significant correlates of repeat abortion using stepwise multivariate multinomial logistic regression to identify factors uniquely associated with repeat abortion.

Results: Of the 1221 women approached, 1145 (93.8%) consented to participate. Data regarding first versus repeat abortion were available for 1127 women. A total of 68.2%, 23.1% and 8.7% of the women were seeking a first, second, or third or subsequent abortion respectively. Adjusted odds ratios for undergoing repeat versus a first abortion increased significantly with increased age (second abortion: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.09; third or subsequent abortion: 1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.15), oral contraceptive use at the time of conception (second abortion: 2.17, 95% CI 1.52-3.09; third or subsequent abortion: 2.60, 95% CI 1.51-4.46), history of physical abuse by a male partner (second abortion: 2.04, 95% CI 1.39-3.01; third or subsequent abortion: 2.78, 95% CI 1.62-4.79), history of sexual abuse or violence (second abortion: 1.58, 95% CI 1.11-2.25; third or subsequent abortion: 2.53, 95% CI 1.50-4.28), history of sexually transmitted disease (second abortion: 1.50, 95% CI 0.98-2.29; third or subsequent abortion: 2.26, 95% CI 1.28-4.02) and being born outside Canada (second abortion: 1.83, 95% CI 1.19-2.79; third or subsequent abortion: 1.75, 95% CI 0.90-3.41).

Interpretation: Among other factors, a history of physical or sexual abuse was associated with repeat induced abortion. Presentation for repeat abortion may be an important indication to screen for a current or past history of relationship violence and sexual abuse.

Citing Articles

Characteristics and contraceptive practices among Chinese women seeking abortion: a multicentre, descriptive study from 2019 to 2021.

Tu P, Hu D, Wu S, Li J, Jiang X, Pei K BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2024; 50(4):252-261.

PMID: 38702180 PMC: 11503149. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202181.


Inequalities in sexual and reproductive outcomes among women aged 16-24 in England (2012-2019).

Solomon D, Gibbs J, Burns F, Mohammed H, Migchelsen S, Sabin C J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024; 78(7):451-457.

PMID: 38609173 PMC: 11187355. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2023-220835.


"I Need Help With the Abortion, so I Won't Have to Ever See or Hear From Him Again": Relationship Barriers Faced by Abortion Fund Applicants in the Rocky Mountain West.

Liddell J, Buscaglia A, Doria C, Weekley A, Mascarena L Violence Against Women. 2024; :10778012241236671.

PMID: 38439713 PMC: 11374929. DOI: 10.1177/10778012241236671.


Prevalence and determinants of repeat induced abortion in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Seyoum K, Mengistu S Heliyon. 2023; 9(10):e20277.

PMID: 37810839 PMC: 10550621. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20277.


Interest in and Uptake of Postabortion Long-Acting Reversible Contraception After Counseling at a Free-Standing Abortion Care Ambulatory Surgery Center, Atlanta, Georgia, 2017‒2018.

Wall K, Phillips V, Xue A, Cordes S, Riley H, Anderson E Am J Public Health. 2022; 112(9):1257-1260.

PMID: 35797505 PMC: 9382184. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306940.


References
1.
TIETZE C . Repeat abortions--why more?. Fam Plann Perspect. 1978; 10(5):286-8. View

2.
Muehlenhard C, Highby B, Lee R, Bryan T, Dodrill W . The sexual revictimization of women and men sexually abused as children: a review of the literature. Annu Rev Sex Res. 1999; 9:177-223. View

3.
Wiebe E, Janssen P . Universal screening for domestic violence in abortion. Womens Health Issues. 2001; 11(5):436-41. DOI: 10.1016/s1049-3867(01)00074-3. View

4.
Henshaw S . Induced abortion: a world review, 1990. Int Fam Plann Persp. 1990; 16(2):59-65, 76. View

5.
Byrne D, Kelley K, Fisher W . Unwanted teenage pregnancies: incidence, interpretation, and intervention. Appl Prev Psychol. 1993; 2(2):101-13. DOI: 10.1016/s0962-1849(05)80116-7. View