» Articles » PMID: 15711722

Staging in Childhood Lymphoma: Differences Between FDG-PET and CT

Overview
Journal Nuklearmedizin
Publisher Thieme
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2005 Feb 16
PMID 15711722
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The clinical value of positron emission tomography using fluorine-18 fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG-PET) in the staging of adult lymphoma has been shown in many studies. However, there are only few data regarding childhood lymphoma. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the staging of childhood lymphoma using FDG-PET and the established computed tomography (CT).

Method: Whole-body FDG-PET was performed in 25 children with histologically proven Hodgkin's disease (n = 18) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 7) using a dedicated PET. The findings were compared with the CT results. Both examinations, FDG-PET and CT, were assessed by two experienced physicians. In each patient, 30 regions were analysed (22 nodal, 8 extranodal). Each region was assessed using a five value scale (definitely/probably positive, equivocal, probably/definitely negative).

Results: 662 regions (470 nodal, 192 extranodal) were compared. 91 regions (81 nodal, 10 extranodal; 14%) were concordant positive and 517 regions (347 nodal, 170 extranodal; 78%) were concordant negative. In 47 regions, 48 discordant findings (7%) were described: 27 findings (22 nodal, 5 extranodal) were positive using FDG-PET and negative using CT whereas 21 findings (17 nodal, 4 extranodal) were positive using CT and negative using PET. A total of 7 regions (1%) were judged equivocal in one imaging modality (1 FDG-PET, 6 CT). Using FDG-PET as compared to CT, resulted in a higher staging in 4 of 25 patients and in a lower staging in 2 of 25 patients.

Conclusion: Staging of childhood lymphoma using FDGPET shows differences compared with CT resulting in a different staging in 6 of 25 patients. Prospective studies are required to evaluate the impact of these discrepancies on the clinical management of pediatric patients.

Citing Articles

Paediatric and adolescent Hodgkin lymphoma: information derived from diffuse organ uptake of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose on pre-treatment and on interim PET/CT.

Jorgov L, Montravers F, Balogova S, Ragu C, Pacquement H, Leblanc T Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 43(7):1220-30.

PMID: 26660144 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3280-6.


The utility of FDG PET in diagnosis and follow-up of lymphoma in childhood.

Sioka C Eur J Pediatr. 2013; 172(6):733-8.

PMID: 23559330 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-013-1993-8.


FDG PET/CT in children and adolescents with lymphoma.

Kluge R, Kurch L, Montravers F, Mauz-Korholz C Pediatr Radiol. 2013; 43(4):406-17.

PMID: 23525767 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-012-2559-z.


18F-FDG PET/CT in paediatric lymphoma: comparison with conventional imaging.

London K, Cross S, Onikul E, Dalla-Pozza L, Howman-Giles R Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010; 38(2):274-84.

PMID: 20848280 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1619-6.


Role of PET/CT in malignant pediatric lymphoma.

Riad R, Omar W, Kotb M, Hafez M, Sidhom I, Zamzam M Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009; 37(2):319-29.

PMID: 19756591 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1276-9.