» Articles » PMID: 15689193

Recognition and Management of Migraine in Primary Care: Influence of Functional Impact Measured by the Headache Impact Test (HIT)

Overview
Journal Cephalalgia
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2005 Feb 4
PMID 15689193
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of the present study was to investigate the influence of headache-related disability on the recognition and management of migraine by French general practitioners (GPs). Forty-nine teaching GPs at the Faculty of Medicine in the Nice-Sophia-Antipolis University were involved in this study. On one day, each patient who presented during the surgery hours of these GPs was invited to complete a questionnaire aimed at identifying if he/she was a headache sufferer and, if so, whether the headache corresponded to migraine and had an impact on his/her functional ability. Functional disability was measured by the short-form of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). Being blind to the patients' responses, the GPs completed a questionnaire for each patient aimed at identifying if he/she considered the patient to suffer from migraine and, if so, whether he/she managed the patient for migraine. A total of 696 patients were included in this study and 289 (41.52%) of them had episodic headache. According to the new International Headache Society (IHS) criteria, 113 (16.24%) patients suffered from headache without migrainous features and 176 (25.29%) patients were migraine sufferers (migraine according to IHS categories 1.1 and 1.2.1: 11.21%, and probable migraine according to IHS categories 1.6.1 and 1.6.2: 14.08%). The mean HIT score of these migraine sufferers was 59.1+/-8.8 and 50% of them presented with a very severe impact score (HIT score>60). Among the 176 migraine sufferers, 105 (59.7%) were not recognized as having migraine, 21 (11.9%) were recognized as having migraine but without migraine management and 50 (28.4%) were recognized as having migraine with migraine management. Recognition of migraine by GPs was statistically associated with the HIT score (OR=1.105, 95% CI: 1.056-1.157, P<0.001) and with the 1.1 and 1.2.1 IHS diagnostic categories (OR=2.942, 95% CI: 1.286-5.025, P=0.0107) whereas management of patients recognized as having migraine was only associated with the patient's age (OR=1.051, 95% CI: 1.000-1.104, P=0.0486). These results indicate that the continuing medical education of GPs should focus on the diagnosis of migraine and its impact on the lifestyle of the patient.

Citing Articles

Accuracy of migraine diagnosis and treatment by neurologists in the Baltic states: e-survey with clinical case challenge.

Jokubaitis M, Vrublevska G, Zvaune L, Braschinsky M, Leheste A, Saknitis G Eur J Med Res. 2023; 28(1):600.

PMID: 38110980 PMC: 10726575. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01555-z.


Migraine Patient Care Model Preferences in a Community Practice.

Stern J, Ebbert J, Vierkant R, Young N Neurol Clin Pract. 2023; 13(2):e200131.

PMID: 37064592 PMC: 10101712. DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200131.


Prevalence and correlates of sleep quality in the Chinese college students with migraine: a cross-sectional study.

Zhao J, Cen Y, Yang J, Liu C, Li Y, Ren Z Front Behav Neurosci. 2022; 16:1037103.

PMID: 36386779 PMC: 9663843. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1037103.


Adjunctive treatment of chronic migraine using an oral dental device: overview and results of a randomized placebo-controlled crossover study.

Blumenfeld A, Boyd J BMC Neurol. 2022; 22(1):72.

PMID: 35246048 PMC: 8895632. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02591-8.


Validation of the "My Headache Checker" that includes osmophobia in the diagnosis of migraine.

Matsushita M, Matsumoto K, Kitamura S, Komatsu N, Seo H, Takeuchi S J Gen Fam Med. 2021; 22(1):24-27.

PMID: 33457152 PMC: 7796788. DOI: 10.1002/jgf2.368.