» Articles » PMID: 15687138

Opportunity for Intervention to Achieve American Heart Association Guidelines for Optimal Lipid Levels in High-risk Women in a Managed Care Setting

Overview
Journal Circulation
Date 2005 Feb 3
PMID 15687138
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The American Heart Association (AHA) recently established evidence-based recommendations for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention in women, including lipid management. This study evaluated optimal lipid-level attainment and treatment patterns on the basis of these guidelines in high-risk women in a managed care setting.

Methods And Results: We conducted a historical prospective cohort analysis of a 1.1-million-member, integrated, managed-care database. Eligible high-risk women were those with evidence of previous CVD or risk equivalent who had a full lipid panel available between October 1, 1999, and September 30, 2000; were naive to lipid therapy; and had a minimum of 12 months health plan eligibility preindex and postindex lipid panel. Optimal lipid levels were defined as LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) <100 mg/dL, HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) >50 mg/dL, non-HDL-C <130 mg/dL, and triglycerides <150 mg/dL. Laboratory values and lipid pharmacotherapy were assessed longitudinally over the postindex follow-up (up to 36 months). A total of 8353 high-risk women (mean age, 66+/-14 years) with a mean follow-up of 27+/-8 months were included. Only 7% attained optimal combined lipid levels initially, and this increased to 12% after 36 months. Lipid-modifying therapy was initiated in 32% of patients, including 35% of women with LDL-C > or =100 mg/dL and 15% with LDL-C <100 mg/dL.

Conclusions: Among high-risk women, few attained the AHA's standards for all lipid fractions, and only one third received recommended drug therapy, highlighting significant opportunities to apply evidence-based recommendations to manage lipid abnormalities in high-risk women.

Citing Articles

Potential Impact of 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Hypertension Guideline on Contemporary Practice: A Cross-Sectional Analysis From NCDR PINNACLE Registry.

Hussain A, Virani S, Zheng L, Gluckman T, Borden W, Masoudi F J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11(11):e024107.

PMID: 35656989 PMC: 9238704. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024107.


A Comparison of Statin Therapies in Hypercholesterolemia in Women: A Subgroup Analysis of the STELLAR Study.

Welty F, Lewis S, Friday K, Cain V, Anzalone D J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015; 25(1):50-6.

PMID: 26539650 PMC: 4741209. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5271.


Evaluation of sexual dimorphism in the efficacy and safety of simvastatin/atorvastatin therapy in a southern Brazilian cohort.

Smiderle L, Lima L, Hutz M, Van Der Sand C, Van Der Sand L, Ferreira M Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014; 103(1):33-40.

PMID: 25120083 PMC: 4126759. DOI: 10.5935/abc.20140085.


Effect of gender, caregiver, on cholesterol control and statin use for secondary prevention among hospitalized patients with coronary heart disease.

Hammond G, Mochari-Greenberger H, Liao M, Mosca L Am J Cardiol. 2012; 110(11):1613-8.

PMID: 22901971 PMC: 3496843. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.07.028.


Use of Lipid-Lowering Medications and the Likelihood of Achieving Optimal LDL-Cholesterol Goals in Coronary Artery Disease Patients.

Karalis D, Victor B, Ahedor L, Liu L Cholesterol. 2012; 2012:861924.

PMID: 22888414 PMC: 3410303. DOI: 10.1155/2012/861924.