Ventricular Interaction During Mechanical Ventilation in Closed-chest Anesthetized Dogs
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The cardiac effects of positive pressure ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure are incompletely understood. External constraint due to increased intrathoracic pressure decreases left ventricular end-diastolic volume; the effects on venous return and ventricular interaction are less clear. Phasic changes in inferior vena caval flow, end-diastolic ventricular dimensions and output were measured in seven anesthetized, ventilated normal dogs. During inspiration, caval flow, right ventricular diameter and output decreased; end-diastolic transseptal pressure gradient, septum-to-left ventricular free wall diameter, left ventricular area (ie, left ventricular volume index) and output increased despite the decreased sum of the septum-to-free wall diameters. The reverse occurred during expiration. Increased positive end-expiratory pressure decreased the left ventricular area, but the end-expiratory right ventricular diameter was unchanged. At given airway pressures, right ventricular diameter was greater at higher positive end-expiratory pressures, suggesting that a leftward septal shift (direct ventricular interaction) added to the effect of external constraint on left ventricular end-diastolic volume. In conclusion, positive pressure ventilation reduced right ventricular end-diastolic volume during inspiration and increased the transseptal pressure gradient, which shifted the septum rightward, increasing left ventricular end-diastolic volume and output. The reverse occurred during expiration. Positive end-expiratory pressure constrained left ventricular filling and decreased left ventricular end-diastolic volume further by a leftward septal shift.
Smith J, Senefeld J, Larson K, Joyner M Exp Physiol. 2023; 108(11):1351-1365.
PMID: 37735814 PMC: 10900130. DOI: 10.1113/EP090755.
Bouwmeester J, Belenkie I, Shrive N, Tyberg J J Physiol. 2014; 592(17):3801-12.
PMID: 25015922 PMC: 4192704. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.272963.
Smailys A, Mitchell J, Doig C, Tyberg J, Belenkie I Physiol Rep. 2014; 2(3):e00259.
PMID: 24760513 PMC: 4002239. DOI: 10.1002/phy2.259.