» Articles » PMID: 15680638

Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome: Analysis of Factors Affecting the Outcome

Overview
Journal Surg Neurol
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2005 Feb 1
PMID 15680638
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The indications and timing of treatment, as well as the best treatment method for traumatic central cord syndrome (CCS), remain controversial. The aims of this study are to determine the prognostic factors of traumatic CCS and to determine appropriate surgical indications.

Methods: We reviewed the clinical and radiological data of 47 patients with this syndrome. The data collected included age, neurological status as measured on a scale defined by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the spinal canal on computed tomography, signal intensity change of the spinal cord on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), associated spinal diseases, and the type of treatment received. The correspondence between the clinical and radiological findings and the neurological outcome was investigated.

Results: The patient's age, JOA score on admission, signal intensity change of the spinal cord on MRI, and associated spinal diseases were not significant in predicting the patient's recovery. On the other hand, the AP diameter of the spinal canal (P = .0402) and the interval between injury and surgery (P < .0001) were factors predictive of excellent recovery. In the surgical treatment group, timely surgery was found to improve the outcome, while conservative treatment did not improve the outcome of patients with a low JOA score, a relatively small AP diameter of the spinal canal, or a positive signal intensity change of the spinal cord on T2-weighted MRI.

Conclusion: The AP canal diameter of the spinal canal and the interval between injury and surgery may be reliable predictors of excellent recovery in patients with CCS. We recommend timely surgery, preferably within 2 weeks of injury, to achieve a better functional outcome in selected patients.

Citing Articles

Timing of decompression in central cord syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xu L, Zhong W, Liu C, Zhao H, Xiong Y, Zhou S Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(9):3593-3601.

PMID: 38625584 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08244-3.


Benefits of Early Surgical Treatment for Patients with Multilevel Cervical Canal Stenosis of Acute Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome.

Zhou Q, He W, Lv J, Liu H, Yang H, Zhang J Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(12):3092-3100.

PMID: 37771121 PMC: 10694011. DOI: 10.1111/os.13904.


Central cord syndrome definitions, variations and limitations.

Engel-Haber E, Snider B, Kirshblum S Spinal Cord. 2023; 61(11):579-586.

PMID: 37015975 DOI: 10.1038/s41393-023-00894-2.


Development of a Dynamic Nomogram for Predicting the Probability of Satisfactory Recovery after 6 Months for Cervical Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Yan X, He Y, Jia M, Yang J, Huang K, Zhang P Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(4):1008-1020.

PMID: 36782280 PMC: 10102307. DOI: 10.1111/os.13679.


Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Approaches for Acute Traumatic Central Spinal Cord Syndrome with Multilevel Cervical Canal Stenosis without Cervical Fracture or Dislocation.

Zhou Q, Zhang J, Liu H, Zhou X, He W, Jin Z Int J Clin Pract. 2022; 2022:5132134.

PMID: 35685581 PMC: 9159116. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5132134.