» Articles » PMID: 15656012

Body Image Across Three Generations of Americans: Inter-family Correlations, Gender Differences, and Generation Differences

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2005 Jan 20
PMID 15656012
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Three-hundred-and-eighty-one participants (undergraduates, their parents and grandparents) completed body image (BI; current minus ideal figure ratings) and dieting attitude measures. We found the usual gender gap in BI for the undergraduates (females' BI worse than males), but not for the parents and grandparents. This was due to males' worsening BI with age; females' BI did not differ across generations. The gender gap in dieting attitudes (females more likely to diet) also narrowed with increasing age (again due to males' changing attitudes), but remained significant across generations. In all three generations, females underestimated the size of the figure males found most attractive, whereas males overestimated the analogous figure for females. Finally, we found significant inter-family correlations for BI and dieting for all groups except undergraduate females. We discuss these results within cultural and evolutionary theoretical frameworks.

Citing Articles

Workout Logging Through an mHealth App for Weight Reduction Among Different Generations: Secondary Analysis of the MED PSU×ThaiSook Healthier Challenge.

Sae-Lee K, Surangsrirat D, Parlawong C, Anawilkul T, Assawachamrun N, Boonbandan P JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e45298.

PMID: 37389918 PMC: 10365584. DOI: 10.2196/45298.


Individuation or Identification? Self-Objectification and the Mother-Adolescent Relationship.

Katz-Wise S, Budge S, Lindberg S, Hyde J Psychol Women Q. 2013; 37(3).

PMID: 24363490 PMC: 3867300. DOI: 10.1177/0361684312468425.


Males and females show differential brain activation to taste when hungry and sated in gustatory and reward areas.

Haase L, Green E, Murphy C Appetite. 2011; 57(2):421-34.

PMID: 21718731 PMC: 3516392. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.06.009.

References
1.
Allison D, Faith M . Issues in mapping genes for eating disorders. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997; 33(3):359-68. View

2.
Buss D, Schmitt D . Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol Rev. 1993; 100(2):204-32. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204. View

3.
Bouchard Jr T, Lykken D, McGue M, Segal N, Tellegen A . Sources of human psychological differences: the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart. Science. 1990; 250(4978):223-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.2218526. View

4.
Gardner R, Friedman B, JACKSON N . Methodological concerns when using silhouettes to measure body image. Percept Mot Skills. 1998; 86(2):387-95. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1998.86.2.387. View

5.
Heatherton T, Polivy J, Herman C . Restraint, weight loss, and variability of body weight. J Abnorm Psychol. 1991; 100(1):78-83. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.100.1.78. View