Evidence-based Guidelines As a Foundation for Performance Incentives
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Clinical guidelines, which increasingly build upon impartial analysis of evidence from well-designed studies, have become highly credible sources of information about what forms of care are effective. Consequently, they are attractive as foundations for performance incentives. Unfortunately, they are often complex, and frequently it is infeasible to gather the information required to assess compliance with guidelines at reasonable cost. I discuss the problems in implementing evidence-based guidelines and steps that could be taken to make them more useful as a basis for performance measurement.
Patient-centred and not disease-focused: a review of guidelines and multimorbidity.
Ong K, Lee P, Lee E Singapore Med J. 2019; 61(11):584-590.
PMID: 31489434 PMC: 8040921. DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2019109.
Overtesting and undertesting in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OSullivan J, Albasri A, Nicholson B, Perera R, Aronson J, Roberts N BMJ Open. 2018; 8(2):e018557.
PMID: 29440142 PMC: 5829845. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018557.
Clin Infect Dis. 2017; 66(10):1631-1635.
PMID: 29182749 PMC: 6927848. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix997.
Compliance with clinical pathways for inpatient care in Chinese public hospitals.
He X, Bundorf M, Gu J, Zhou P, Xue D BMC Health Serv Res. 2015; 15:459.
PMID: 26445427 PMC: 4595105. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-1121-8.
Sanchez G, Roberts R, Albert A, Johnson D, Hicks L Emerg Infect Dis. 2014; 20(12):2041-7.
PMID: 25418868 PMC: 4257826. DOI: 10.3201/eid2012.140331.