» Articles » PMID: 15646225

Effect of Conditioner on Bond Strength of Glass-ionomer Adhesive to Dentin/enamel with and Without Smear Layer Interposition

Overview
Journal Oper Dent
Date 2005 Jan 14
PMID 15646225
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effect of a polyalkenoic acid conditioner pretreatment on the bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive to tooth substrates with or without smear layer was evaluated. Smear-layer covered and smear-layer free dentin and enamel surfaces were prepared from 24 extracted human molars. Resin composite was bonded to the surfaces using FujiBond LC with or without a polyalkenoic acid conditioner and subjected to microtensile bond strength (microTBS) testing. Failure modes were determined using scanning electron microscopy. For dentin, smear-layer coverage and conditioner treatment did not reveal significant differences in microTBS, which ranged from 20 to 29 MPa. For enamel, smear-layer coverage did not significantly affect microTBS, whereas, the use of conditioner significantly improved microTBS, reaching the same microTBS-values as when bonded to dentin. Regarding failure mode, most dentin specimens failed mixed adhesive cohesively. For enamel, adhesive failures mostly occurred when no conditioner was used, though mixed failures were predominant when the specimens were conditioned beforehand. Bonding of the glass ionomer adhesive to dentin can be achieved without the separate use of a polyalkenoic acid conditioner, even with the interposition of a smear layer. However, instrumented and non-instrumented enamel requires separate conditioning to provide sufficient micro-mechanical retention.

Citing Articles

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Zinc Phosphate Cement, Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, and Two Dual-Cure Resin Cements: Study.

Jacob J, Devadathan A, Joseph S, Dathan P, Mathew S, Kuriakose R J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022; 14(Suppl 1):S631-S637.

PMID: 36110690 PMC: 9469371. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_756_21.


Shear Bond Strength of a Direct Resin Composite to CAD-CAM Composite Blocks: Relative Contribution of Micromechanical and Chemical Block Surface Treatment.

Fouquet V, Lachard F, Abdel-Gawad S, Dursun E, Attal J, Francois P Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(14).

PMID: 35888491 PMC: 9317483. DOI: 10.3390/ma15145018.


Interfacial Characterization of a Conventional Glass-Ionomer Cement after Functioning for 1-year In Vivo.

Hoshika S, Koshiro K, Inoue S, Tanaka T, Sano H, Sidhu S J Adhes Dent. 2022; 24():203-208.

PMID: 35416448 PMC: 11734312. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.b2916453.


Influence of Conventional Polymer, Hybrid Polymer and Zinc Phosphate Luting Agents on the Bond Strength of Customized Zirconia Post in Premolars-An In-Vitro Evaluation.

AlAali K, Alhelal A, Almahri J, Albakri A, Albani R, Alhaizan Y Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(4).

PMID: 35215671 PMC: 8879678. DOI: 10.3390/polym14040758.


Shear Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill Composites to Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Evaluated by Different Adhesion Protocols.

Bin-Shuwaish M Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020; 12:367-375.

PMID: 32982465 PMC: 7505721. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S273842.