» Articles » PMID: 15627414

Bias in Spatial Memory: a Categorical Endorsement

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2005 Jan 4
PMID 15627414
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two experiments investigated how angular estimates reflect bias as a function of response mode, geometric plane of variation, number of implicit categories, memory load and intervening task conditions. In Experiment 1, participants made motor and verbal estimates of incline and azimuth from memory. Estimates in both response modes showed signs of bias predicted by a single-category adaptation of Huttenlocher et al. [Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352-376] category-adjustment model. In Experiment 2, participants made motor estimates of azimuth from memory under a variety of conditions. Stimuli in this experiment were distributed along two contiguous spatial categories. Although increasing levels of cognitive load did not produce a graded effect, participants' estimates were biased and were well described by a multiple-category adaptation of the category-adjustment model. Results from both studies supported an implicit region-based model of bias in spatial memory. These findings were discussed with respect to accounts of spatial memory that propose multiple systems or formats for coding.

Citing Articles

Individual differences in spatial working memory strategies differentially reflected in the engagement of control and default brain networks.

Purg Suljic N, Kraljic A, Rahmati M, Cho Y, Slana Ozimic A, Murray J Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(8).

PMID: 39214852 PMC: 11364466. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae350.


Neural Evidence for Different Types of Position Coding Strategies in Spatial Working Memory.

Purg N, Starc M, Slana Ozimic A, Kraljic A, Matkovic A, Repovs G Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:821545.

PMID: 35517989 PMC: 9067305. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.821545.


Using analogy to learn about phenomena at scales outside human perception.

Resnick I, Davatzes A, Newcombe N, Shipley T Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017; 2(1):21.

PMID: 28367501 PMC: 5357664. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-017-0054-7.


Perceived azimuth direction is exaggerated: Converging evidence from explicit and implicit measures.

Li Z, Durgin F J Vis. 2016; 16(1):4.

PMID: 26756174 PMC: 4743713. DOI: 10.1167/16.1.4.


Anchoring in action: manual estimates of slant are powerfully biased toward initial hand orientation and are correlated with verbal report.

Shaffer D, McManama E, Swank C, Williams M, Durgin F J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014; 40(3):1203-12.

PMID: 24661067 PMC: 4218750. DOI: 10.1037/a0036217.