Bias in Spatial Memory: a Categorical Endorsement
Overview
Affiliations
Two experiments investigated how angular estimates reflect bias as a function of response mode, geometric plane of variation, number of implicit categories, memory load and intervening task conditions. In Experiment 1, participants made motor and verbal estimates of incline and azimuth from memory. Estimates in both response modes showed signs of bias predicted by a single-category adaptation of Huttenlocher et al. [Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352-376] category-adjustment model. In Experiment 2, participants made motor estimates of azimuth from memory under a variety of conditions. Stimuli in this experiment were distributed along two contiguous spatial categories. Although increasing levels of cognitive load did not produce a graded effect, participants' estimates were biased and were well described by a multiple-category adaptation of the category-adjustment model. Results from both studies supported an implicit region-based model of bias in spatial memory. These findings were discussed with respect to accounts of spatial memory that propose multiple systems or formats for coding.
Purg Suljic N, Kraljic A, Rahmati M, Cho Y, Slana Ozimic A, Murray J Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(8).
PMID: 39214852 PMC: 11364466. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae350.
Neural Evidence for Different Types of Position Coding Strategies in Spatial Working Memory.
Purg N, Starc M, Slana Ozimic A, Kraljic A, Matkovic A, Repovs G Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:821545.
PMID: 35517989 PMC: 9067305. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.821545.
Using analogy to learn about phenomena at scales outside human perception.
Resnick I, Davatzes A, Newcombe N, Shipley T Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017; 2(1):21.
PMID: 28367501 PMC: 5357664. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-017-0054-7.
Perceived azimuth direction is exaggerated: Converging evidence from explicit and implicit measures.
Li Z, Durgin F J Vis. 2016; 16(1):4.
PMID: 26756174 PMC: 4743713. DOI: 10.1167/16.1.4.
Shaffer D, McManama E, Swank C, Williams M, Durgin F J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014; 40(3):1203-12.
PMID: 24661067 PMC: 4218750. DOI: 10.1037/a0036217.