» Articles » PMID: 15627187

MRI-guided Abdominal Biopsy in a 0.23-T Open-configuration MRI System

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2005 Jan 1
PMID 15627187
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that when ultrasound (US) guidance is not feasible, abdominal biopsies can be performed safely and accurately under magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance in a low-field environment. MRI-guided abdominal biopsy was performed on 31 consecutive patients, in whom US-guided abdominal biopsy was not possible because the lesion was not visualized in US (n=27) or an US-guided procedure was not considered safe (n=4). The locations of the lesions were liver (n=14), pancreas (n=6), lymph node (n=4), retroperitoneal mass (n=3), adrenal gland (n=3) and spleen (n=1). The average size of the lesion was 2.2 cm (range 1-4 cm) in maximum diameter. All procedures were done by using a 0.23-T open-configuration C-arm-shaped MRI scanner with interventional optical tracking equipment and software. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy was performed on all 31 patients; 18 patients underwent both FNA biopsy and cutting needle core biopsy. Procedures were evaluated for diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy as well as procedure time and complications. The FNA biopsy specimens were adequate for interpretation in 27 (87%) of 31 cases. Two of these proved to be false-negative findings during follow-up or subsequent biopsy. The final diagnosis was malignant in 15 and benign in 16 patients. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FNA biopsy were 71, 100 and 81%, respectively. Of the 18 core-needle biopsies, one was determined false-negative owing to nonrepresentativeness. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of histological samples were 90, 100 and 94%, respectively. The needle time was 19 min on average and the mean room time was 1 h 48 min. No immediate or late complications occurred. MRI-guided abdominal biopsy can be performed safely and accurately in a low-field environment in patients for whom an US-guided procedure is not feasible.

Citing Articles

Percutaneous Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Coaxial Cutting Needle Biopsy of Pancreatic Lesions: Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety.

Zhang F, Jin G, Dai M, Ding M, Zhang J, Zhang X Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023; 46(11):1603-1609.

PMID: 37311840 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03485-z.


MRI-guided percutaneous needle biopsy with 1.2T open MRI: study protocol for a prospective feasibility study (SCIRO-1701).

Matsui Y, Sakurai J, Hiraki T, Okamoto S, Iguchi T, Tomita K Nagoya J Med Sci. 2019; 81(3):463-468.

PMID: 31579336 PMC: 6728197. DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.81.3.463.


Percutaneous MR-guided interventions using an optical Moiré Phase tracking system: Initial results.

Kagebein U, Godenschweger F, Armstrong B, Rose G, Wacker F, Speck O PLoS One. 2018; 13(10):e0205394.

PMID: 30325955 PMC: 6191114. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205394.


Evaluation of percutaneous biopsies of renal masses under MRI-guidance: a retrospective study about 26 cases.

Garnon J, Schlier A, Buy X, Tsoumakidou G, de Mathelin M, Breton E Eur Radiol. 2014; 25(3):617-23.

PMID: 25312553 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3449-6.


MRI-guided laser ablation of neuroendocrine tumor hepatic metastases.

Perala J, Klemola R, Kallio R, Li C, Vihriala I, Salmela P Acta Radiol Short Rep. 2014; 3(1):2047981613499753.

PMID: 24778794 PMC: 4001425. DOI: 10.1177/2047981613499753.


References
1.
Lewin J, Petersilge C, Hatem S, Duerk J, Lenz G, Clampitt M . Interactive MR imaging-guided biopsy and aspiration with a modified clinical C-arm system. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 170(6):1593-601. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.170.6.9609180. View

2.
Sequeiros R, Hyvonen P, Sequeiros A, Jyrkinen L, Ojala R, Klemola R . MR imaging-guided laser ablation of osteoid osteomas with use of optical instrument guidance at 0.23 T. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13(10):2309-14. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-1897-5. View

3.
Lee M, Lufkin R, Borges A, Lu D, Sinha S, Farahani K . MR-guided procedures using contemporaneous imaging frameless stereotaxis in an open-configuration system. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998; 22(6):998-1005. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199811000-00030. View

4.
Kreitner K, Loew R, Runkel M, Zollner J, Thelen M . Low-field MR arthrography of the shoulder joint: technique, indications, and clinical results. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13(2):320-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1665-y. View

5.
Salomonowitz E . MR imaging-guided biopsy and therapeutic intervention in a closed-configuration magnet: single-center series of 361 punctures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 177(1):159-63. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.177.1.1770159. View