» Articles » PMID: 15626992

Comparison of Multifidus Muscle Atrophy and Trunk Extension Muscle Strength: Percutaneous Versus Open Pedicle Screw Fixation

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2005 Jan 1
PMID 15626992
Citations 169
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: This study was conducted by retrospective case selection and prospective observation of longitudinal changes of the multifidus muscle cross-sectional area and of trunk extension muscle strength in percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixations.

Objectives: To compare postoperative multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk muscle performance of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation against those of open pedicle screw fixation.

Summary Of Background Data: Recent attempts to combine percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with minimally invasive fusion techniques are based on an anecdotal presupposition that percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is superior to its open counterpart. However, the benefits of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation are currently poorly defined.

Methods: Nineteen enrolled patients were divided as follows: 11 in the open pedicle screw fixation group (OPF group) and eight in the percutaneous pedicle screw fixation group (PPF group). The preoperative and postoperative cross-sectional area and T2-weighted signal intensity of multifidus muscle were measured by MRI, and trunk extension muscle strength was measured. In addition, various clinical variables were compared between two groups.

Results: There was significant decrease in the cross-sectional area of multifidus muscle in the OPF group. In contrast, the results in the PPF group showed no statistical difference between preoperative results and that of the follow-up MRI. Although percutaneous pedicle screw fixation had positive effects on postoperative trunk muscle performance, clinical outcomes were not significantly different in areas of pain score, JOA score, and patient's opinion regarding the outcome of the surgery. However, percutaneous pedicle screw fixation caused less blood loss, and the proportion of patients who did not need postoperative oral analgesics was greater in the PPF group.

Conclusions: Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation caused less paraspinal muscle damage than open pediclescrew fixation and had positive effects on postoperative trunk muscle performance.

Citing Articles

The Paraspinal Sarcopenia at the Upper Instrumented Vertebra Is a Predictor of Discoligamentous but Not Bony Proximal Junctional Kyphosis.

Pennington Z, Mikula A, Hamouda A, Potes M, Nassr A, Freedman B J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004738 PMC: 11857086. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041207.


Posterior Instrumentation without Curettage Promotes Rapid Restoration of Adult Spinal Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis.

Otsuki B, Kimura H, Fujibayashi S, Shimizu T, Sono T, Murata K Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024; 8(6):637-643.

PMID: 39659370 PMC: 11625713. DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2024-0040.


A Comparative Study between Single-Level Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease.

Chang C, Lin Y, Wu Y, Shih C, Chen K, Pan C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(19).

PMID: 39407903 PMC: 11476864. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13195843.


Prospective comparative analysis of three types of decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: conventional, full-endoscopic, and biportal endoscopic laminectomy.

Hwang Y, Kim J, Chough C, Cho J, Kim H, Jang J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19853.

PMID: 39191792 PMC: 11349896. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65923-3.


The feasibility and efficacy of pedicle fixation by the Wiltse approach in the thoracic spine.

Hao L, Xiang Y, Liu J Front Surg. 2024; 11:1406111.

PMID: 38974716 PMC: 11225353. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1406111.