» Articles » PMID: 15623474

Best Practice No 180. Nephrectomy for Renal Tumour; Dissection Guide and Dataset

Overview
Journal J Clin Pathol
Specialty Pathology
Date 2004 Dec 30
PMID 15623474
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Renal tumours constitute 2.5% of all malignancies and are among the 10 most common malignancies in the UK. Most of these are renal cell carcinomas (RCC) of various subtypes. Although historically RCC has been shown to be resistant to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, recent data suggest that the use of biological treatments, such as adjuvants, may be beneficial in patients with disease that has progressed at the time of presentation. The accurate diagnosis, staging, and grading of RCC is now a crucial element in optimal patient management. There are data to support the importance of histological type, tumour size, stage (especially patterns of extrarenal spread), and grade in determining outcome, and these data have been used to develop the published classification (Heidelberg/Rochester), staging (TNM), and grading (Fuhrman) systems. This article describes a dissection and histological sampling protocol that has been shown to increase the yield of staging information, a guide to histological classification and grading, and finally a minimum dataset for the completion of a satisfactory pathology report.

Citing Articles

The ISUP system of staging, grading and classification of renal cell neoplasia.

Samaratunga H, Gianduzzo T, Delahunt B J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2017; 1(3):26-39.

PMID: 28326247 PMC: 5345524. DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.2014.11.


Histopathology of surgically treated renal tumours in young adults: a developing country perspective.

Mubarak M, Kazi J, Mohsin R, Hashmi A, Naqvi S, Ul Hassan Rizvi S J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011; 138(2):189-94.

PMID: 22083212 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-011-1082-1.


Assessment of the Cardiff nephrectomy cut-up protocol with total blocking of the renal sinus: effect on tumour staging and practical issues.

Soilleux E, Roberts I J Clin Pathol. 2006; 59(11):1209-11.

PMID: 17071809 PMC: 1860515. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2005.034793.

References
1.
Blom J, van Poppel H, Marechal J, Jacqmin D, Sylvester R, Schroder F . Radical nephrectomy with and without lymph node dissection: preliminary results of the EORTC randomized phase III protocol 30881. EORTC Genitourinary Group. Eur Urol. 1999; 36(6):570-5. DOI: 10.1159/000020050. View

2.
Eble J . Recommendations for examining and reporting tumor-bearing kidney specimens from adults. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1998; 15(1):77-82. View

3.
Bonsib S, Gibson D, Mhoon M, Greene G . Renal sinus involvement in renal cell carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000; 24(3):451-8. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200003000-00015. View

4.
Leroy X, Moukassa D, Copin M, Saint F, MAZEMAN E, Gosselin B . Utility of cytokeratin 7 for distinguishing chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from renal oncocytoma. Eur Urol. 2000; 37(4):484-7. DOI: 10.1159/000020172. View

5.
Igarashi T, Tobe T, Nakatsu H, Suzuki N, Murakami S, Hamano M . The impact of a 4 cm. cutoff point for stratification of T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy. J Urol. 2001; 165(4):1103-6. View