» Articles » PMID: 15610326

A Practical Randomized Trial to Improve Diabetes Care

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2004 Dec 22
PMID 15610326
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: There is a well-documented gap between diabetes care guidelines and the services received by patients in almost all health care settings. This project reports initial results from a computer-assisted, patient-centered intervention to improve the level of recommended services received by patients from a wide variety of primary care providers.

Design And Settings: Eight hundred eighty-six patients with type 2 diabetes under the care of 52 primary care physicians participated in the Diabetes Priority Program. Physicians were stratified and randomized to intervention or control conditions and evaluated on 2 primary outcomes: number of recommended laboratory screenings and recommended patient-centered care activities completed. Secondary outcomes were evaluated using the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 depression scale, and the RE-AIM framework was used to evaluate potential for dissemination.

Results: The program was well-implemented and significantly improved both number of recommended laboratory assays (3.4 vs 3.1; P <.001) and patient-centered aspects of diabetes care patients received (3.6 vs 3.2; P <.001) compared to those in randomized control practices. Activities that were increased most were foot exams (follow-up rates of 80% vs 52%; P <.003) and nutrition counseling (76% vs 52%; P <.001).

Conclusions: Patients are very willing to participate in a brief computer-assisted intervention that is effective in enhancing quality of diabetes care. Staff in primary care offices can consistently deliver an intervention of this nature, but most physicians were unwilling to participate in this translation research study.

Citing Articles

Diabetic Foot Care: A Screening on Primary Care Providers' Attitude and Practice in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

AlSheikh S, Alghofili H, Alageel R, Ababtain O, Alarify G, Alwehaibi N Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(1).

PMID: 36676687 PMC: 9861771. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59010064.


Disparities in Time to Treatment for Breast Cancer: Shifting Focus to the Root Cause.

Bayard S, Bea V Ann Surg Oncol. 2022; 29(11):6520-6521.

PMID: 35913668 PMC: 9341160. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11948-9.


The Patient-Centered Approach: A Review of the Literature and Its Application for Acoustic Neuromas.

Hong C, Moliterno J J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2020; 81(3):280-286.

PMID: 32500003 PMC: 7253312. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692396.


Symptom prevalence differences of depression as measured by BDI and PHQ scales in the Look AHEAD study.

Vaughan E, Johnston C, Moreno J, Cheskin L, Dutton G, Gee M Obes Sci Pract. 2020; 6(1):28-38.

PMID: 32128240 PMC: 7042097. DOI: 10.1002/osp4.378.


Redesigning Primary Care to Improve Diabetes Outcomes (the UNITED Study).

Peterson K, Carlin C, Solberg L, Jacobsen R, Kriel T, Eder M Diabetes Care. 2019; 43(3):549-555.

PMID: 31882407 PMC: 7035583. DOI: 10.2337/dc19-1140.


References
1.
Glasgow R, Funnell M, Bonomi A, Davis C, Beckham V, Wagner E . Self-management aspects of the improving chronic illness care breakthrough series: implementation with diabetes and heart failure teams. Ann Behav Med. 2002; 24(2):80-7. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2402_04. View

2.
Stange K, Woolf S, Gjeltema K . One minute for prevention: the power of leveraging to fulfill the promise of health behavior counseling. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 22(4):320-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00413-0. View

3.
Von Korff M, Glasgow R, Sharpe M . Organising care for chronic illness. BMJ. 2002; 325(7355):92-4. PMC: 1123637. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7355.92. View

4.
Bodenheimer T, Wagner E, Grumbach K . Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002; 288(14):1775-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1775. View

5.
Heisler M, Smith D, Hayward R, Krein S, Kerr E . How well do patients' assessments of their diabetes self-management correlate with actual glycemic control and receipt of recommended diabetes services?. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(3):738-43. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.738. View