» Articles » PMID: 15603978

Bone Biochemical Markers in Adolescent Girls Using Either Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate or an Oral Contraceptive

Overview
Date 2004 Dec 18
PMID 15603978
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Objective: To examine the relationship between biochemical markers of bone metabolism and hormonal contraception in adolescents.

Design: A prospective, observational design.

Setting: The study was conducted in four adolescent health clinics in a large metropolitan area.

Participants: The study population comprised healthy, postmenarcheal adolescent girls aged 12-18 initiating either medroxyprogesterone acetate (n=53) or an oral contraceptive (OC) containing 20 mug ethinyl estradiol/100 mug levonorgestrel (n=165) and those using no hormonal contraception (n=152).

Interventions: None.

Main Outcome Measures: Serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD), and bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline and 12 months.

Results: At 12 month follow-up, serum BSAP levels were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the control group (40.4 U/L +/- 1.03 SE), than in the DMPA group (35.2 U/L +/- 1.05 SE) and the OC group (35.5 U/L +/- 1.03 SE). There was a trend in urinary DPD levels to be higher (P=0.08) in the control group (9.9 nmol/mmol Cr +/- 1.03 SE) than in the DMPA group (9.1 +/- 1.05 SE) and the OC group (8.9 +/- 1.03 SE). No relationship was found between the biochemical markers and BMD at the lumbar spine or the femoral neck.

Conclusions: Over 12 months, there was evidence of increased bone formation and resorption in the control group when compared to that in the DMPA and OC groups. This finding may indicate a suppression of bone metabolism in girls using DMPA or an OC containing 20 mug ethinyl estradiol/100 mug levonorgestrel.

Citing Articles

Hormonal Contraception and Bone Metabolism: Emerging Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies on Post-Pubertal and Reproductive-Age Women.

Tassi A, Londero A, Xholli A, Lanzolla G, Bertozzi S, Savelli L Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025; 18(1).

PMID: 39861124 PMC: 11768253. DOI: 10.3390/ph18010061.


Comparing a common clavicle maturation-based age estimation method to ordinary regression analyses with quadratic and sex-specific interaction terms in adolescents.

Reder S, Fritzen I, Brockmann M, Hardt J, Elsner K, Petrowski K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2754.

PMID: 38307929 PMC: 10837444. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52980-x.


EFFECT OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY.

Ampatzis C, Zervoudis S, Iatrakis G, Mastorakos G Acta Endocrinol (Buchar). 2023; 18(3):355-360.

PMID: 36699167 PMC: 9867809. DOI: 10.4183/aeb.2022.355.


Combined hormonal contraceptives use and bone mineral density changes in adolescent and young women in a prospective population-based Canada-wide observational study.

Brajic T, Berger C, Schlammerl K, MacDonald H, Kalyan S, Hanley D J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2018; 18(2):227-236.

PMID: 29855445 PMC: 6016495.


The associations of exposure to combined hormonal contraceptive use on bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density accrual from adolescence to young adulthood: A longitudinal study.

Jackowski S, Baxter-Jones A, McLardy A, Pierson R, Rodgers C Bone Rep. 2017; 5:e333-e341.

PMID: 28580404 PMC: 5440951. DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2015.06.001.