» Articles » PMID: 15599588

Body Size As a Determinant of the 1-h Cycling Record at Sea Level and Altitude

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2004 Dec 16
PMID 15599588
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was designed to validate models for predicting the two Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) classifications for the 1-h cycling record at sea level and altitude. Specific attention was paid to the integration of model components that were sensitive to scaling differences in body mass (m(b)). The Modern Aero Position model predicted UCI Best Hour performances using predictions of total projected frontal area (A(P)) that included use of an aerodynamic bicycle and aerodynamic handlebars. The Traditional Racing Position model predicted UCI Hour Record performances using predictions of total A(P) that include use of a "Merckx-era" bicycle with drop-style handlebars. Prediction equations for A(P), as well as the coefficient of drag and metabolic power output , involved scaling relationships with m(b), while other model components were similar to previously published 1-h models. Both models were solved for the distance cycled in 1 h (D(HR)) using an iterative strategy. Chris Boardman's current records for the UCI Best Hour Performance (56.375 km) and the UCI Hour Record (49.202 km) were underpredicted by only 0.332 km (-0.6%) and 0.239 km (-0.5%). Both models, regardless of altitude, suggested that D(HR) should scale with m(b) to the +0.174 power (D(HR) alpha m(b) (+0.174)), which is lower than the +0.32 exponent recently suggested in the literature. Lastly, the same models also predicted that six-time Tour de France winner, Lance Armstrong, could exceed both of Boardman's current records at sea level by about 2.0 km.

Citing Articles

Is a sub 7-h Ironman possible?.

Jolicoeur Desroches A, Goulet E Front Sports Act Living. 2022; 4:866599.

PMID: 36091871 PMC: 9453846. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.866599.


Analysis of Cyclist's Drag on the Aero Position Using Numerical Simulations and Analytical Procedures: A Case Study.

Forte P, Marinho D, Nikolaidis P, Knechtle B, Barbosa T, Morais J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(10).

PMID: 32423103 PMC: 7277172. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103430.


Upper body power as a determinant of classical cross-country ski performance.

Alsobrook N, Heil D Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008; 105(4):633-41.

PMID: 19039602 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-008-0943-z.


Optimal power-to-mass ratios when predicting flat and hill-climbing time-trial cycling.

Nevill A, Jobson S, Davison R, Jeukendrup A Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006; 97(4):424-31.

PMID: 16685550 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-006-0189-6.

References
1.
. 1997 AAHPERD National Convention. St. Louis, Missouri, March 19-23, 1997. Abstracts. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1997; 68(1 Suppl):A1-129. View

2.
Nevill A, Ramsbottom R, Williams C . Scaling physiological measurements for individuals of different body size. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1992; 65(2):110-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00705066. View

3.
di Prampero P, Cortili G, Mognoni P, Saibene F . Equation of motion of a cyclist. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1979; 47(1):201-6. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1979.47.1.201. View

4.
di Prampero P . Cycling on Earth, in space, on the Moon. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000; 82(5-6):345-60. DOI: 10.1007/s004210000220. View

5.
Capelli C, di Prampero P . Effects of altitude on top speeds during 1 h unaccompanied cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995; 71(5):469-71. DOI: 10.1007/BF00635883. View