» Articles » PMID: 15580725

Regulatory and Ethical Principles in Research Involving Children and Individuals with Developmental Disabilities

Overview
Journal Ethics Behav
Specialty Psychology
Date 2004 Dec 8
PMID 15580725
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Children and individuals with developmental disabilities (DD) compared to typical participants are disadvantaged not only by virtue of being vulnerable to risks inherent in research participation but also by the higher likelihood of exclusion from research altogether. Current regulatory and ethical guidelines although necessary for their protection do not sufficiently ensure fair distributive justice. Yet, in view of disproportionately higher burdens of co-occurring physical and mental disorders in individuals with DD, they are better positioned to benefit from research by equitable participation. Greater elucidation of this ethical dilemma is called for by researchers, institutional review boards, and funding agencies to urgently redress the imbalance. This article discusses many of the regulatory principles to ensure better research participation of children and individuals with DD: human rights, validity, distributive justice, beneficence/nonmaleficence, and autonomy.

Citing Articles

(Epistemic) Injustice and Resistance in Canadian Research Ethics Governance.

Clairmont S, Doerksen E, Gunay A, Friesen P Ethics Hum Res. 2025; 47(1):2-19.

PMID: 39749365 PMC: 11696195. DOI: 10.1002/eahr.60004.


Evaluating the Decisional Capacity for Informed Consent of Transition age Children to Adolescents in Human Subject Research.

Salayev K, Aslanova U, Munir K J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023; 19(1-2):28-36.

PMID: 38073174 PMC: 10957319. DOI: 10.1177/15562646231219384.


Ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review.

Mezinska S, Gallagher L, Verbrugge M, Bunnik E Hum Genomics. 2021; 15(1):16.

PMID: 33712057 PMC: 7953558. DOI: 10.1186/s40246-021-00317-4.


Supporting informed clinical trial decisions: Results from a randomized controlled trial evaluating a digital decision support tool for those with intellectual disability.

McCormack L, Wylie A, Moultrie R, Furberg R, Wheeler A, Treiman K PLoS One. 2019; 14(10):e0223801.

PMID: 31644588 PMC: 6808417. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223801.


Protocol for a cohort study of adolescent mental health service users with a nested cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of managed transition in improving transitions from child to adult mental health....

Singh S, Tuomainen H, de Girolamo G, Maras A, Santosh P, McNicholas F BMJ Open. 2017; 7(10):e016055.

PMID: 29042376 PMC: 5652531. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016055.


References
1.
Weithorn L, Campbell S . The competency of children and adolescents to make informed treatment decisions. Child Dev. 1982; 53(6):1589-98. View

2.
Lieberman J . Ethical dilemmas in clinical research with human subjects: an investigator's perspective. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1996; 32(1):19-25. View

3.
Reiss S, Benson B . Psychosocial correlates of depression in mentally retarded adults: I. Minimal social support and stigmatization. Am J Ment Defic. 1985; 89(4):331-7. View

4.
LEVINE R . The impact of HIV infection on society's perception of clinical trials. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1994; 4(2):93-8. DOI: 10.1353/ken.0.0054. View

5.
Munir K, Beardslee W . Developmental psychiatry: is there any other kind?. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 1999; 6(5):250-62. DOI: 10.3109/10673229909000337. View